Utah Code » Title 63G, Chapter 3 — Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act; part 63G-3-2 — Circumstances Requiring Rulemaking - Status of Administrative Rules
Utah Code

Utah Code § 63G-3-202 (2026)

Rules having the effect of law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A rule made in accordance with this chapter has the effect of law.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2017–2020 · leading case: Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020). · cites it 2× “” UTAH CODE § 63G-3-202(2). Because an agency’s rule has the force and effect of law, it is subject to a constitutional challenge.”
Phillips v. Dep't of Com., Div. of Sec., 2017 UT App 84 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-3-202(2) (LexisNexis 2014) (“An agency’s written statement that is made as a rule .”
United States v. Meadows, 353 F. Supp. 3d 1167 (D. Utah 2018). · cites it 4× “Utah Code Ann. § 63G-3-202. Ms. Meadows contends R714 was not made as a rule in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 3.”
— Utah Code § 63G-3-202(2) — 2 cases
Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020). “” UTAH CODE § 63G-3-202(2). Because an agency’s rule has the force and effect of law, it is subject to a constitutional challenge.”
Phillips v. Dep't of Com., Div. of Sec., 2017 UT App 84 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). “See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-3-202(2) (LexisNexis 2014) (“An agency’s written statement that is made as a rule .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.