Utah Code » Title 63G, Chapter 3 — Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act; part 63G-3-6 — Judicial Review
Utah Code

Utah Code § 63G-3-601 (2026)

Interested parties -- Petition for agency action

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
An interested person may petition an agency to request the making, amendment, or repeal of a rule.
The office shall prescribe by rule the form for petitions and the procedure for their submission, consideration, and disposition.
A statement shall accompany the proposed rule demonstrating that the proposed action is within the jurisdiction of the agency and appropriate to the powers of the agency.
Within 60 days after submission of a petition, the agency shall:
deny the petition in writing, stating reasons for the denial; or
initiate rulemaking proceedings to implement the petition.
If the petition is submitted to a board or commission that has been granted rulemaking authority by the Legislature, the board shall, within 45 days of the submission of the petition, place the petition on its agenda for review.
Within 80 days of the submission of the petition, the board or commission shall either:
deny the petition in writing stating its reasons for denial; or
initiate rulemaking proceedings to implement the petition.
If the agency, board, or commission has not provided the petitioner written notice that the agency has denied the petition or initiated rulemaking proceedings to implement the petition within the time limitations specified in Subsection (4) or (5) respectively, the petitioner may seek a writ of mandamus in state district court.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2020–2024 · leading case: Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020). · cites it 3× “Under the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, he may petition the Commission to enact, amend, or repeal a rule, UTAH CODE § 63G-3-601(2), including the rule adopting the Utah Guidelines.”
Miller Theatres v. Tax Comm'n, 2024 UT 8 (Utah 2024). “” UTAH CODE § 63G-3-601(2). See generally UTAH ADMIN.”
— Utah Code § 63G-3-601(2) — 2 cases
Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020). “Under the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, he may petition the Commission to enact, amend, or repeal a rule, UTAH CODE § 63G-3-601(2), including the rule adopting the Utah Guidelines.”
Miller Theatres v. Tax Comm'n, 2024 UT 8 (Utah 2024). “” UTAH CODE § 63G-3-601(2). See generally UTAH ADMIN.”
— Utah Code § 63G-3-601(5) — 1 case
Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020). “Under the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, he may petition the Commission to enact, amend, or repeal a rule, UTAH CODE § 63G-3-601(2), including the rule adopting the Utah Guidelines.”
— Utah Code § 63G-3-601(7) — 1 case
Ramos v. Cobblestone Centre, 2020 UT 55 (Utah 2020). “Under the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act, he may petition the Commission to enact, amend, or repeal a rule, UTAH CODE § 63G-3-601(2), including the rule adopting the Utah Guidelines.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.