Utah Code

Utah Code § 63G-4-301 (2026)

Agency review -- Procedure

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a statute or the agency's rules permit parties to any adjudicative proceeding to seek review of an order by the agency or by a superior agency, the aggrieved party may file a written request for review within 30 days after the issuance of the order with the person or entity designated for that purpose by the statute or rule.

The request shall:

be signed by the party seeking review;

state the grounds for review and the relief requested;

state the date upon which it was mailed; and

be mailed to the presiding officer and to each party.

Within 15 days of the mailing date of the request for review, or within the time period provided by agency rule, whichever is longer, any party may file a response with the person designated by statute or rule to receive the response.

The party who files a response under Subsection (2)(a) shall mail a copy of the response to each of the parties and to the presiding officer.

If a statute or the agency's rules require review of an order by the agency or a superior agency, the agency or superior agency shall review the order within a reasonable time or within the time required by statute or the agency's rules.

To assist in review, the agency or superior agency may by order or rule permit the parties to file briefs or other documents, or to conduct oral argument.

Notice of hearings on review shall be mailed to all parties.

Within a reasonable time after the filing of any response, other filings, or oral argument, or within the time required by statute or applicable rules, the agency or superior agency shall issue a written order on review.

The order on review shall be signed by the agency head or by a person designated by the agency for that purpose and shall be mailed to each party.

The order on review shall contain:

a designation of the statute or rule permitting or requiring review;

a statement of the issues reviewed;

findings of fact as to each of the issues reviewed;

conclusions of law as to each of the issues reviewed;

the reasons for the disposition;

whether the decision of the presiding officer or agency is to be affirmed, reversed, or modified, and whether all or any portion of the adjudicative proceeding is to be remanded;

a notice of any right of further administrative reconsideration or judicial review available to aggrieved parties; and

the time limits applicable to any appeal or review.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2023 · leading case: Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 2009 UT 71 (Utah 2009).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 2009 UT 71 (Utah 2009). · cites it 8× “29 123 As the Appeals Board correctly recognized, section 63G-4-301 of UAPA requires a party seeking review of an ALJ's decision to file a written request for review within thirty days in accordance with applicable statutes or ageney rules.”

Rivers v. DEQ, 2017 UT 64 (Utah 2017). · cites it 2× “Intervening as an “aggrieved party” under Utah Code section 63G-4-301, Living Rivers asked UDEQ to revoke USOS’s permit by rule and require USOS “to comply with the full range of regulatory requirements” necessary to obtain a full-blown discharge permit.”

Rivers v. Exec. Dir. of the Utah Dep't of Envtl. Quality & the Dir. of the Utah Div. of Water Quality, 417 P.3d 57 (Utah 2017). · cites it 2× “Intervening as an "aggrieved party" under Utah Code section 63G-4-301, Living Rivers asked UDEQ to revoke USOS's permit by rule and require USOS "to comply with the full range of regulatory requirements" necessary to obtain a full-blown discharge permit.”

Perez v. South Jordan City, 2013 UT 1 (Utah 2013). · cites it 4× “See Uraw Cope § 63G-4-301(6)(a). Such an order must be "signed by the agency head or by a person designated by the agency for that purpose and it shall be mailed to each party.”

Friends of Great Salt Lake v. Utah Dep't of Nat. Resources, 2010 UT 20 (Utah 2010). · cites it 4× “See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-301. Rule 652-8-200 designates all requests for agency adjudication, including applications for lease, as informal.”

Johnson v. Dep't of Com., 2023 UT App 152 (Utah Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 8× “3d 568 (citing Utah Code § 63G-4-301(1)(a)). Because Counsel did not timely mail the request for review, the filing was not complete and the Executive meaning of its text.”

— Utah Code § 63G-4-301(1)(a) — 2 cases

Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 2009 UT 71 (Utah 2009). “29 123 As the Appeals Board correctly recognized, section 63G-4-301 of UAPA requires a party seeking review of an ALJ's decision to file a written request for review within thirty days in accordance with applicable statutes or ageney rules.”

Johnson v. Dep't of Com., 2023 UT App 152 (Utah Ct. App. 2023). “3d 568 (citing Utah Code § 63G-4-301(1)(a)). Because Counsel did not timely mail the request for review, the filing was not complete and the Executive meaning of its text.”

— Utah Code § 63G-4-301(1)(b)(iii) — 1 case

— Utah Code § 63G-4-301(6)(a) — 1 case

Perez v. South Jordan City, 2013 UT 1 (Utah 2013). “See Uraw Cope § 63G-4-301(6)(a). Such an order must be "signed by the agency head or by a person designated by the agency for that purpose and it shall be mailed to each party.”

— Utah Code § 63G-4-301(6)(b) — 1 case

— Utah Code § 63G-4-301(6)(c)(vii) — 1 case

— Utah Code § 63G-4-301(6)(c)(viii) — 1 case

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.