Utah Code » Title 63G, Chapter 4 — Administrative Procedures Act; part 63G-4-3 — Agency Review
Utah Code

Utah Code § 63G-4-302 (2026)

Agency review -- Reconsideration

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Within 20 days after the date that an order is issued for which review by the agency or by a superior agency under Section 63G-4-301 is unavailable, and if the order would otherwise constitute final agency action as described in Section 63G-4-403, any party may file a written request for reconsideration with the agency, stating the specific grounds upon which relief is requested.
Unless otherwise provided by statute, the filing of the request is not a prerequisite for seeking judicial review of the order.
The request for reconsideration shall be filed with the agency and one copy shall be mailed to each party by the person making the request.
The agency head, or a person designated for that purpose, shall issue a written order granting the request or denying the request.
If the agency head or the person designated for that purpose does not issue an order within 20 days after the filing of the request, the request for reconsideration shall be considered to be denied.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2009–2025 · leading case: Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016). · cites it 4× “§ 63G-4-302(1)(a). 37 . Id. § 63G-4-302(3)(a).”
Wright v. Labor Comm'n, 2021 UT App 43 (Utah Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 4× “Based on that alleged conflict, Wright asks this court to set aside the Commission’s decision and order the appointment of a new medical panel.”
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2014 UT App 219 (Utah Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 7× “Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (LexisNexis 2011).”
Resort Retainers v. Labor Comm'n, 2010 UT App 229 (Utah Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 4× “Code R602-2-1(0); see also Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302 (2008) (outlining agency review procedures).”
Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor Comm'n, 2009 UT 71 (Utah 2009). · cites it 2× “Renumbered as Utah Code section 63G-4-302 (2008). On October 23, 2006, when the Appeals Board issued its decision in this matter, UAPA was codified as Title 63 Chapter 46b in the Utah Code.”
Darvish v. Labor Comm'n Appeals Bd., 2012 UT App 68 (Utah Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “ISSUES AND STANDARDS OF REVIEW $16 Darvish advances multiple challenges to the Board's ruling. We consider two in detail.”
Dinger v. Dep't of Workforce Servs., Workforce Appeals Bd., 2013 UT App 59 (Utah Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “5 See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302 (LexisNexis 2011).”
Pentskiff Interpreting Servs. v. Dep't of Health, Div. of Medicaid & Health Fin. Off. of Formal Hearings, 305 P.3d 218 (Utah Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 5× “" See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (emphasis added).”
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). · cites it 4× “” ¶22 Water Horse timely requested reconsideration under Utah Code section 63G-4-302. Water Horse requested that Colorado’s state engineer support its reconsideration request by signing a proposed letter to Utah’s state engineer drafted by Water Horse’s counsel.”
Rathmann v. Labor Comm'n, 2011 UT App 110 (Utah Ct. App. 2011). “See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-401 (2008). A party must exhaust administrative remedies before filing a petition for review.”
Salt Lake Donated v. Dept. of Workforce, 2011 UT App 7 (Utah Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “" Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (2008). [3] Employer also argues that the affidavits were "before the Board on reconsideration (which motion the Board refused to consider), were specifically stamped as received and accepted by the Board, and were made by the Board, and…”
— Utah Code § 63G-4-302(1)(a) — 6 cases
Wright v. Labor Comm'n, 2021 UT App 43 (Utah Ct. App. 2021). “Based on that alleged conflict, Wright asks this court to set aside the Commission’s decision and order the appointment of a new medical panel.”
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016). “§ 63G-4-302(1)(a). 37 . Id. § 63G-4-302(3)(a).”
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2014 UT App 219 (Utah Ct. App. 2014). “Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (LexisNexis 2011).”
Pentskiff Interpreting Servs. v. Dep't of Health, Div. of Medicaid & Health Fin. Off. of Formal Hearings, 305 P.3d 218 (Utah Ct. App. 2013). “" See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (emphasis added).”
Salt Lake Donated v. Dept. of Workforce, 2011 UT App 7 (Utah Ct. App. 2011). “" Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (2008). [3] Employer also argues that the affidavits were "before the Board on reconsideration (which motion the Board refused to consider), were specifically stamped as received and accepted by the Board, and were made by the Board, and…”
— Utah Code § 63G-4-302(1)(b) — 2 cases
Pentskiff Interpreting Servs. v. Dep't of Health, Div. of Medicaid & Health Fin. Off. of Formal Hearings, 305 P.3d 218 (Utah Ct. App. 2013). “" See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (emphasis added).”
Rathmann v. Labor Comm'n, 2011 UT App 110 (Utah Ct. App. 2011). “See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-401 (2008). A party must exhaust administrative remedies before filing a petition for review.”
— Utah Code § 63G-4-302(3)(a) — 1 case
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016). “§ 63G-4-302(1)(a). 37 . Id. § 63G-4-302(3)(a).”
— Utah Code § 63G-4-302(3)(b) — 3 cases
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2016 UT 10 (Utah 2016). “§ 63G-4-302(1)(a). 37 . Id. § 63G-4-302(3)(a).”
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2014 UT App 219 (Utah Ct. App. 2014). “Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (LexisNexis 2011).”
Water Horse v. Wilhelmsen, 2025 UT 43 (Utah 2025). “” ¶22 Water Horse timely requested reconsideration under Utah Code section 63G-4-302. Water Horse requested that Colorado’s state engineer support its reconsideration request by signing a proposed letter to Utah’s state engineer drafted by Water Horse’s counsel.”
— Utah Code § 63G-4-302(8)(b) — 2 cases
Monarrez v. Utah Dep't of Transp., 2014 UT App 219 (Utah Ct. App. 2014). “Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-302(1)(a) (LexisNexis 2011).”
Darvish v. Labor Comm'n Appeals Bd., 2012 UT App 68 (Utah Ct. App. 2012). “ISSUES AND STANDARDS OF REVIEW $16 Darvish advances multiple challenges to the Board's ruling. We consider two in detail.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.