Utah Code

Utah Code § 70A-9a-104 (2026)

Control of deposit account

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A secured party has control of a deposit account if:

the secured party is the bank with which the deposit account is maintained;

the debtor, secured party, and bank have agreed in a signed record that the bank will comply with instructions originated by the secured party directing disposition of the funds in the deposit account without further consent by the debtor;

the secured party becomes the bank's customer with respect to the deposit account; or

another person, other than the debtor:

has control of the deposit account and acknowledges that it has control on behalf of the secured party; or

obtains control of the deposit account after having acknowledged that it will obtain control of the deposit account on behalf of the secured party.

A secured party that has satisfied Subsection (1) has control, even if the debtor retains the right to direct the disposition of funds from the deposit account.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Platte Valley Bank v. Tetra Fin. Grp., LLC, 682 F.3d 1078 (8th Cir. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Platte Valley Bank v. Tetra Fin. Grp., LLC, 682 F.3d 1078 (8th Cir. 2012). “Utah Code Ann. § 70A-9a-104(l). Comment 3 to U.”

— Utah Code § 70A-9a-104(l) — 1 case

Platte Valley Bank v. Tetra Fin. Grp., LLC, 682 F.3d 1078 (8th Cir. 2012). “Utah Code Ann. § 70A-9a-104(l). Comment 3 to U.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.