Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 04, § 437 (2026)
Repealed. 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 238.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 4 V.S.A. § 437)
-
§ 437. Repealed. 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 238.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1974–2000 · leading case: Gokey v. Bessette, 580 A.2d 488 (Vt. 1990).
Gokey v. Bessette, 580 A.2d 488 (Vt. 1990). “See 4 V.S.A. § 437. *568 The dismissal of that portion of plaintiff’s complaint seeking recovery of rent from June 17 through September 30, 1986 is reversed, and plaintiff is awarded judgment in the amount of $1,370.”
Trudeau v. Conway, 423 A.2d 854 (Vt. 1980). “4 V.S.A. § 437. The district court had jurisdiction of the plaintiff’s claim.”
Gerrish Corp. v. Dworkin, 483 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1984). “4 V.S.A. § 437. The district court’s general civil jurisdiction is concurrent with that of the superior court “where the ad damnum is over $200.”
State v. Crannell, 768 A.2d 1260 (Vt. 2000). “See 4 V.S.A. § 437. The district court’s ancillary jurisdiction to order return of property is based in equity, Kornell, 169 Vt.”
Hendricks v. Dietrich, 376 A.2d 770 (Vt. 1977). “4 V.S.A. § 437. Judgment vacated for lack of jurisdiction in the trial court.”
Carney v. O'Byrn, 321 A.2d 35 (Vt. 1974). “The relevant jurisdictional statute for the district court is 4 V.S.A. § 437, which reads in part: “The district court shall have jurisdiction of civil actions wherein the debt is not over $5,000.”
Foong v. Quesnel, 376 A.2d 53 (Vt. 1977). “§ 219; 4 V.S.A. § 437; In re Estate of Leonard, 132 Vt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.