An appeal from a decision of a magistrate shall be on the record to the Family Division
of the Superior Court. At the request of a party, the Family Court shall hear additional
evidence. (Added 1989, No. 221 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. Oct. 1, 1990; amended 2009, No. 154, § 238.)
Harris v. Harris, 714 A.2d 626 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2ד4 V.S.A. § 465. "The primary consideration in an award of attorney's fees is the ability of the supporting party to pay and the financial needs of the party receiving the award.”
Patnode v. Urette, 2014 VT 46 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 2דMother is appealing the superior court’s decision and the magistrate’s remanded order following the superior court’s directive, but there is no indication in the record that mother ever appealed the magistrate’s order on remand to the superior court before commencing her appeal…”
In re R.L., 657 A.2d 180 (Vt. 1995). “4 V.S.A. § 465. Further, Title 18 does not provide for appeals to the family court from any administrative decision regarding mentally ill patients.”
Williams v. Williams, 613 A.2d 200 (Vt. 1992). “It appears from the record that the matter of support was before the magistrate at the time the trial court entered its order.”
Joe Golden v. Gwyn Worthington, 2020 VT 71 (Vt. 2020). “In this appeal, we are asked to review the family court’s decision affirming the magistrate’s denial of father’s motion to reconsider the December 7 enforcement order. An appeal of a magistrate’s order to the family court is based “solely on the record” unless additional…”
Ian Baron v. Molly McGinty, 2021 VT 6 (Vt. 2021). “However, 4 V.S.A. § 465 provides that “[a]n appeal from a decision of a magistrate shall be on the record to the Family Division of the Superior Court.”
Tetreault v. Coon, 708 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1998). “We start -with the decision of the magistrate because that decision best raises the underlying issues.”
Bergman v. Marker, 2007 VT 139 (Vt. 2007). “2d 200, 202 (1992) (under 4 V.S.A. § 465, “order of the magistrate is appealable .”
Merch. v. Merch., 2015 VT 72 (Vt. 2015). “See 4 V.S.A. § 465; V.R.F.P. 8(g). Father renewed his arguments that the magistrate incorrectly established the guideline amount by (1) incorrectly calculating his monthly income, imputing a higher income than was actually the case; (2) relying on a guideline calculation that…”
LaMothe v. LeBlanc, 199 Vt. 448 (Vt. 2015). “On appeal to this Court, father principally argues that the magistrate erred by not awarding him the entire $4370 lump-sum derivative benefit, by not finding mother voluntarily underemployed, and by deviating from the guidelines.”
LaMothe v. LeBlanc, 124 A.3d 817 (Vt. 2015). “On appeal to this Court, father principally argues that the magistrate erred by not awarding him the entire $4370 lump-sum derivative benefit, by not finding mother voluntarily underemployed, and by deviating from *451 the guidelines.”
Patnode v. Urette, 199 Vt. 306 (Vt. 2015). “Mother appealed, and the family division affirmed. [2] Mother then filed an appeal with this Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.