Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 05, § 3639 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : FARM CROSSINGS, CATTLE GUARDS, FENCES, AND WATERCOURSES

(Cite as: 5 V.S.A. § 3639)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2015–2026 · leading case: Roxanne Moran v. Vermont State Ret. Bd. & Vermont State Treasurer, 2015 VT 119 (Vt. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roxanne Moran v. Vermont State Ret. Bd. & Vermont State Treasurer, 2015 VT 119 (Vt. 2015). “, 5 V.S.A. § 3639 (transportation board orders to reopen railroad cattle-crossings); 13 V.”
Roback v. Wash Cty R.R. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 3× “By not seeking an agreement from affected landowners or petitioning the Board, the Railroad’s actions violated 5 V.S.A. § 3639(a), which requires such procedural steps to be taken by a party seeking to close a railroad crossing.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 05, § 3639(a) — 1 case
Roback v. Wash Cty R.R. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “By not seeking an agreement from affected landowners or petitioning the Board, the Railroad’s actions violated 5 V.S.A. § 3639(a), which requires such procedural steps to be taken by a party seeking to close a railroad crossing.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 05, § 3639(b) — 1 case
Roback v. Wash Cty R.R. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “By not seeking an agreement from affected landowners or petitioning the Board, the Railroad’s actions violated 5 V.S.A. § 3639(a), which requires such procedural steps to be taken by a party seeking to close a railroad crossing.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.