In Re Johnston, 488 A.2d 750 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 3ד7 V.S.A. § 236. We hold that licensee has failed to make the clear and convincing showing necessary to overcome the presumption of validity.”
In Re Judy Ann's Inc., 464 A.2d 752 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 2דAlthough support for appellant’s reading of 7 V.S.A. § 236 may be found in the first sentence of that section, “[individual statutes .”
Verrill v. Dewey, 299 A.2d 182 (Vt. 1972). · cites it 3ד7 V.S.A. § 236 states: “The control commissioners or the liquor control board shall have the power to suspend or revoke any permit *632 or license granted pursuant to this title in the event the person holding such permit or license shall at any time during the term thereof so…”
In Re Handy, 481 A.2d 1051 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2דOn June 3, 1983, the Board, pursuant to 7 V.S.A. § 236, notified the defendant that a hearing would be held to consider testimony regarding the defendant’s alleged violation of general regulation 12 of the Board.”
Coliseum Enter., Inc. v. Campbell, 795 A.2d 1212 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 4דThe manner in which the commissioners rescinded the application, plaintiffs contend, did not comport with due process because the commissioners did not comply with the revocation proceedings laid out in 7 V.”
Verrill v. Daley, 236 A.2d 238 (Vt. 1967). “Acting under the provisions of 7 V.S.A. section 236, petitioner’s first-class license was revoked September 19, 1967 without the benefit of a hearing before the liquor control board.”
Routhier v. Goggins, 229 F. Supp. 3d 299 (D. Vt. 2017). “records,” and § 3(7)(a), which prohibits licensees and their employees from “interfering] with” or “failing] to cooperate with” investigators. The liquor control statutes provide that the violation of any liquor control statutes or regulations—including those relating to…”
Goatworld, Ltd. v. Liquor Control Bd. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). · cites it 3דSpecifically, Plaintiff cites to 7 V.S.A. § 236 (suspension or revocation of license or permit; administrative penalty).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 07, § 236(a) — 1 case
Coliseum Enter., Inc. v. Campbell, 795 A.2d 1212 (Vt. 2002). “The manner in which the commissioners rescinded the application, plaintiffs contend, did not comport with due process because the commissioners did not comply with the revocation proceedings laid out in 7 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 07, § 236(d) — 1 case
Goatworld, Ltd. v. Liquor Control Bd. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “Specifically, Plaintiff cites to 7 V.S.A. § 236 (suspension or revocation of license or permit; administrative penalty).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.