Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 2603 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 2603)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2024 · leading case: Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 7× “It thus declared Okemo Mountain Road a public road because it is on public land for the use of the general public.”
Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Bd., 2004 VT 104 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 2× “None of the arguments raised by Lysobey or the amicus curiae [2] convince us that we should reconsider Okemo II or that no taking is possible because the Department is without authority under 10 V.S.A. § 2603(c) to regulate use of roads on land under its jurisdiction.”
standing trees v. state (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Standing as to Count 1, 10 V.S.A. § 2603 The parties disagree as to whether 2603(c)(1), which speaks to FPR rulemaking, required FPR to adopt the policies at issue in this case as rules.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 2603(c) — 2 cases
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). “It thus declared Okemo Mountain Road a public road because it is on public land for the use of the general public.”
Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. v. Town of Ludlow Zoning Bd., 2004 VT 104 (Vt. 2004). “None of the arguments raised by Lysobey or the amicus curiae [2] convince us that we should reconsider Okemo II or that no taking is possible because the Department is without authority under 10 V.S.A. § 2603(c) to regulate use of roads on land under its jurisdiction.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 2603(e) — 1 case
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). “It thus declared Okemo Mountain Road a public road because it is on public land for the use of the general public.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.