Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 2608 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 2608)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). “argue that no remedy is appropriate because the Department can regulate Okemo Mountain Road pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 2608(c), which authorizes the Department to regulate and restrict access.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 2608(c) — 1 case
Okemo Mountain, Inc. v. Town of Ludlow, 762 A.2d 1219 (Vt. 2000). “argue that no remedy is appropriate because the Department can regulate Okemo Mountain Road pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 2608(c), which authorizes the Department to regulate and restrict access.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.