Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4081 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : REGULATORY POWERS OVER FISH AND WILDLIFE

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 4081)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–2018 · leading case: State v. Ronald Dupuis, 197 A.3d 343 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ronald Dupuis, 197 A.3d 343 (Vt. 2018). “The State, through the Commissioner of Fish and Wildlife, shall safeguard the fish, wildlife, and fur-bearing animals of the State for the people of the State, and the State shall fulfill this duty with a constant and continual vigilance.”
State v. Curtis, 603 A.2d 356 (Vt. 1991). “See 10 V.S.A. § 4081(a) (“the policy of the state [is] that the protection, propagation, control, management and conservation of.”
Minnesota Ex Rel. Hatch v. Hoeven, 370 F. Supp. 2d 960 (D.N.D. 2005). “regulation limits to eight percent the number of permits for antelope, spring turkey, and in certain deer hunts); 2004 Utah Big Game Proclamation, 39-49 (limits to approximately eleven percent the number of non-resident permits in big game limited permit hunts); 2005 Utah Big…”
State of Minnesota v. John Hoeven, 456 F.3d 826 (8th Cir. 2006). “gov/proc-lamations/2005_biggame/; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10 § 4081(g)(2) (2005) (limiting nonresidents to ten percent of antlerless deer permits); W.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4081(a) — 2 cases
State v. Ronald Dupuis, 197 A.3d 343 (Vt. 2018). “The State, through the Commissioner of Fish and Wildlife, shall safeguard the fish, wildlife, and fur-bearing animals of the State for the people of the State, and the State shall fulfill this duty with a constant and continual vigilance.”
State v. Curtis, 603 A.2d 356 (Vt. 1991). “See 10 V.S.A. § 4081(a) (“the policy of the state [is] that the protection, propagation, control, management and conservation of.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4081(g)(2) — 2 cases
Minnesota Ex Rel. Hatch v. Hoeven, 370 F. Supp. 2d 960 (D.N.D. 2005). “regulation limits to eight percent the number of permits for antelope, spring turkey, and in certain deer hunts); 2004 Utah Big Game Proclamation, 39-49 (limits to approximately eleven percent the number of non-resident permits in big game limited permit hunts); 2005 Utah Big…”
State of Minnesota v. John Hoeven, 456 F.3d 826 (8th Cir. 2006). “gov/proc-lamations/2005_biggame/; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10 § 4081(g)(2) (2005) (limiting nonresidents to ten percent of antlerless deer permits); W.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.