Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 201
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8020 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : ENFORCEMENT

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8020)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2021 · leading case: In re Treetop Dev. Co. Act 250 Dev. (Treetop at Stratton Condo. Assn., Inc., Appellant), 2016 VT 20 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Treetop Dev. Co. Act 250 Dev. (Treetop at Stratton Condo. Assn., Inc., Appellant), 2016 VT 20 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “” The NRB and ANR are empowered to enforce Act 250 and the amended permit and the Association, as an interested party, may participate, and in fact is participating, in those proceedings by the rights vested under 10 V.S.A. § 8020. The Association remains free to raise any…”
In re Champlain Parkway Wetland Conditional Use Determination (Fortieth Burlington, LLC), 202 A.3d 953 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8020. The viability of these options and Fortieth's likelihood of success in pursuing these alternate avenues is beyond the scope of this opinion; we note them merely to demonstrate that there are other ways to monitor the project's impacts on local wetlands.”
ANR v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLP - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). · cites it 6× “CLF has intervened under 10 V.S.A. § 8020 to challenge the penalty amount in the proposed AOD as insufficient to carry out the purposes of the Administrative Environmental Law Enforcement statutes, 10 V.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 5× “The statute, 10 V.S.A. § 8020, amended the public participation requirements in environmental enforcement actions, making it easier for third parties to intervene.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 6× “This Court, by its November 14, 2014 entry order , granted the Association’s motion to intervene in the enforcement proceeding pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8020. In a subsequent status conference the parties questioned whether § 8020 mandates a hearing as to whether the AOD is…”
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). · cites it 3× “See 10 V.S.A. § 8020(a). The Court infers a final requirement in the “aggrieved person” definition—that a party’s particularized injury be redressable in a given proceeding.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 5× “In its motion to intervene, the Association argued that it was an “aggrieved person” under 10 V.S.A. § 8020 because it had a particularized interest in ensuring that the AOD contained adequate stormwater remediation measures.”
NRB v. Strattom Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 4× “In the present motion, the Association moves to intervene in this action under 10 V.S.A. § 8020. Section 8020 allows for a person aggrieved by an administrative order, assurance of discontinuance, or civil citation to intervene so long as the person filed comments on the order,…”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2× “This Court, by its November 14, 2014 entry order, granted the Association’s motion to intervene in the enforcement proceeding pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8020. NRB v. Stratton Corp., No 106-7-14 Vtec, slip op.”
ANR v. Colaceci (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Colaceci was continuing to operate his facility without a permit, and posted it for public comment, as required by 10 V.S.A. § 8020. On February 25, 2015, ANR moved 2 to continue the merits hearing on the 2012 AO, which had been set for March 11, on the basis that it was…”
ANR v. Colacecci (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Colaceci was continuing to operate his facility without a permit, and posted it for public comment, as required by 10 V.S.A. § 8020. On February 25, 2015, ANR moved to continue the merits hearing on the 2012 AO, which had been set for March 11, on the basis that it was planning…”
NRB v. Stratton (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “’s (the Association) motion to intervene in this enforcement action pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8020, recognizing that the intervention was limited to the issue of whether the terms of the AOD were insufficient to carry out the purposes of the enforcement statutes.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8020(a) — 4 cases
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “In its motion to intervene, the Association argued that it was an “aggrieved person” under 10 V.S.A. § 8020 because it had a particularized interest in ensuring that the AOD contained adequate stormwater remediation measures.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8020(a). The Court infers a final requirement in the “aggrieved person” definition—that a party’s particularized injury be redressable in a given proceeding.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “This Court, by its November 14, 2014 entry order , granted the Association’s motion to intervene in the enforcement proceeding pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8020. In a subsequent status conference the parties questioned whether § 8020 mandates a hearing as to whether the AOD is…”
NRB v. Strattom Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “In the present motion, the Association moves to intervene in this action under 10 V.S.A. § 8020. Section 8020 allows for a person aggrieved by an administrative order, assurance of discontinuance, or civil citation to intervene so long as the person filed comments on the order,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8020(c) — 3 cases
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8020(a). The Court infers a final requirement in the “aggrieved person” definition—that a party’s particularized injury be redressable in a given proceeding.”
ANR v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLP - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “CLF has intervened under 10 V.S.A. § 8020 to challenge the penalty amount in the proposed AOD as insufficient to carry out the purposes of the Administrative Environmental Law Enforcement statutes, 10 V.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “In its motion to intervene, the Association argued that it was an “aggrieved person” under 10 V.S.A. § 8020 because it had a particularized interest in ensuring that the AOD contained adequate stormwater remediation measures.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8020(h) — 5 cases
ANR v. Vorsteveld Farm, LLP - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “CLF has intervened under 10 V.S.A. § 8020 to challenge the penalty amount in the proposed AOD as insufficient to carry out the purposes of the Administrative Environmental Law Enforcement statutes, 10 V.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “The statute, 10 V.S.A. § 8020, amended the public participation requirements in environmental enforcement actions, making it easier for third parties to intervene.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “This Court, by its November 14, 2014 entry order , granted the Association’s motion to intervene in the enforcement proceeding pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8020. In a subsequent status conference the parties questioned whether § 8020 mandates a hearing as to whether the AOD is…”
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “This Court, by its November 14, 2014 entry order, granted the Association’s motion to intervene in the enforcement proceeding pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8020. NRB v. Stratton Corp., No 106-7-14 Vtec, slip op.”
NRB v. Strattom Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “In the present motion, the Association moves to intervene in this action under 10 V.S.A. § 8020. Section 8020 allows for a person aggrieved by an administrative order, assurance of discontinuance, or civil citation to intervene so long as the person filed comments on the order,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8020(i) — 2 cases
NRB v. Stratton Corp (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “The statute, 10 V.S.A. § 8020, amended the public participation requirements in environmental enforcement actions, making it easier for third parties to intervene.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8020(a). The Court infers a final requirement in the “aggrieved person” definition—that a party’s particularized injury be redressable in a given proceeding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.