(a) Imprisonment as punishment for contempt, or to enforce orders, sentences, or decrees
in contempt proceedings, or upon execution issued in civil process shall be in a correctional
facility maintained by or for the State.
(b) Any person imprisoned for contempt, in addition to any other legal rights and remedies
available to him or her, shall be entitled to a review of the contempt proceedings
annually. The Commissioner of Corrections shall provide timely notice for the review
of the proceedings of any person so imprisoned to the sentencing court. The sentencing
court shall conduct a hearing and issue its order within 60 days of receipt of notice
from the Commissioner of Corrections. (Amended 1969, No. 141, § 3; 1969, No. 198 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; 1973, No. 66.)
Russell v. Armitage, 697 A.2d 630 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 2ד817 , 819 (1890), contempt proceedings are currently authorized by statute "[w]hen a party violates an order made against him in a cause brought to or pending before a superior judge or a county court or the district court after service of the order upon that party.”
Shahi v. Madden, 2010 VT 56 (Vt. 2010). “§ 1464(a) (authorizing enforcement of hate crimes orders by police officers, including “making an arrest”); 12 V.”
State v. Dragon, 310 A.2d 24 (Vt. 1973). “In the words of then Chief Justice Rowell: “[T]he common law governs here, for we have no constitutional provision on the subject, and no statutory provision save that which enacts that a person who defames a court of justice, or a sentence or proceeding thereof, or defames the…”
ANR v. Meadowcrest Campground LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “Meadowcrest Campground., LLC, No. 63-7-16 Vtec (Motion to Show Cause) (May 1, 2017) Page 2 of 3.”
Sanfacon NOV (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “The parties’ Agreement imposed as a Court Order on October 11, 2013 requires, in pertinent part, the following: (1) John and Phyllis Sanfacon shall remove all inoperative motor vehicles (not including trailers) from their land, as well as all golf carts and all junk and salvage…”
Harrison CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “Harrison explained that she rents the subject property from the owner, Mr.”
Harrison CU Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “Harrison explained that she rents the subject property from the owner, Mr.”
ANR v. Second City Prop, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “This accumulating fine is fully purgeable upon timely completion of the CAP .”
Town of Fairfax v. Beliveau (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “The injunctive order at issue in this motion for contempt requires that Defendant cease the use of the property as a rooming and boarding house and return the use of the property to that of a single-family dwelling, unless Defendant obtains a zoning permit for a change of use.”
ANR v. Second City (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “ANR’s Motion for Sanctions is DENIED; however, ANR may re-file its motion, or a similar one, should Respondents fail to comply with the below schedule for CAP completion.”
ANR v. Second City Prop., LLC & Second City, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “On or before March 14, 2012, Respondents shall complete all activities identified in the Corrective Action Plan, including the physical removal of source area contaminated soil and installation of the granular iron permeable reactive barrier (PRB).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.