When a judgment is for the foreclosure of a mortgage, permission of the court shall
be required for review. (Amended 1959, No. 261, § 66; 1971, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 129, eff. March 29, 1972.)
Prue v. Royer, Sr., & Dep't of Liquor Control, 2013 VT 12 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2דSince we have found that the contract was a contract for deed, that it satisfied the Statute of Frauds, and that plaintiffs did not abandon their equitable interest, it is therefore clear that the relationship between the parties was that of mortgagor and mortgagee.”
Vermont Nat'l Bank v. Clark, 588 A.2d 621 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 2דDefendants appeal from an order granting summary judgment to plaintiff bank in a foreclosure suit and denying defendants’ motion for permission to appeal pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 4601. We reverse and remand. The essence of defendants’ argument is that the bank wrongfully induced…”
Proctor Trust Co. v. Upper Valley Press, Inc., 405 A.2d 1221 (Vt. 1979). “From the consolidated judgment, the plaintiff, with permission, 12 V.S.A. § 4601, appealed, and the defendants filed a cross-appeal.”
Denlinger v. Mudgett, 559 A.2d 661 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 2דBut the record here does not disclose that defendants obtained permission to appeal this issue, as required by 12 V.S.A. § 4601. * Compliance with a statute granting appellate review is required in order to give this Court jurisdiction to review.”
Stowe Ctr., Inc. v. Burlington Sav. Bank, 451 A.2d 1114 (Vt. 1982). “On June 30,1978, plaintiff sought permission to appeal pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 4601, and on July 26, 1978, the trial court orally denied the request, and issued a written order on August 9, 1978.”
City of St. Albans v. Goodrich, 373 A.2d 549 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 2דThe defendants introduced testimony on the issue of the level of reasonableness of fees in such cases, and the trial court found $150.”
Citibank, N.A. v. Groshens, 768 A.2d 1272 (Vt. 2000). “See 12 V.S.A. § 4601 (“When a judgment is for the foreclosure of a mortgage, permission of the court shall be required for review.”
Capital Impact Corp. v. Munro, 642 A.2d 1175 (Vt. 1994). “Because the trial court denied defendants’ request to appeal, a preliminary issue is the jurisdiction of this Court to consider the appeal under 12 V.S.A. § 4601, which states: “When a judgment is for the foreclosure of a mortgage, permission of the court shall be required for…”
Cattle Investors Mgmt. Corp. v. Poutre, 535 A.2d 787 (Vt. 1987). “We dismissed on August 8,1984, for lack of jurisdiction because defendants had not sought leave to appeal from the trial court, pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 4601. No further action was taken until the redemption period expired, and plaintiff obtained a certificate of nonredemption…”
Dartmouth Sav. Bank v. Est. of Schoen Ex Rel. Ainsworth, 276 A.2d 637 (Vt. 1971). “It is from this action that the defendants have appealed with the permission of the court below as required by 12 V.S.A. § 4601. On appeal the defendants specify the following grounds of error: “1.”
Woodbine Condo. Ass'n v. Lowe, 806 A.2d 1001 (Vt. 2002). “2d at 1273 ; see also 12 V.S.A § 4601 (“When a judgment is for the foreclosure of a mortgage, permission of the court shall be required for review.”
Laura A. Cramer (Billado) v. James E. Billado, III, 170 A.3d 633 (Vt. 2017). “While this case was pending, this Court on its own initiative issued an order requesting defendant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file a timely motion for permission to appeal pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 4601 (requiring court permission for…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.