§ 462. Lands for a public, pious, or charitable use
Nothing contained in this chapter shall extend to lands given, granted, sequestered,
or appropriated to a public, pious, or charitable use, or to lands belonging to the
State.
Roy v. Woodstock Cmty. Trust, Inc., 94 A.3d 530 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 17ד” 12 V.S.A. § 462. As the parcels had been owned from 1981 to 2005 by a church, the trial court found that the time for determining adverse possession could not in.”
State v. Atl. Richfield Co., 2016 VT 61 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 10דThis interlocutory appeal calls upon us to decide whether 12 V.S.A. § 462 creates an exemption from the general six-year limitation for the State of Vermont’s claims against a host of defendants for generalized injury to state waters as a whole due to groundwater contamination…”
Mahoney v. Tara, LLC, 2014 VT 90 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 4דbut rather on ‘lands given, granted, sequestered or appropriated to a public, pious or charitable use! ” Id.”
Chittenden v. Waterbury Ctr. Cmty. Church, Inc., 726 A.2d 20 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 7דOn appeal, plaintiffs contend that (1) 12 V.S.A. § 462, which effectively protects property belonging to religious institutions and certain other entities from claims of adverse possession, violates both the U.”
MacDonough-Webster Lodge No. 26 v. Wells, 2003 VT 70 (Vt. 2003). · cites it 4דThe Masons moved for partial summary judgment, arguing that 12 V.S.A. § 462, which exempts lands held “for a public, pious or charitable use” from claims of adverse possession, applied and shielded the Masons’ property against their neighbors’ *384 claims.”
Mahoney v. Tara, LLC, 2011 VT 3 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 4דIn response to the complaint, defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ latter three claims on the ground that plaintiffs could not satisfy the fifteen-year limitations period for adverse possession because defendant’s predecessor in interest was VCC, and therefore, the subject…”
Jarvis v. Gillespie, 587 A.2d 981 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 6דDefendant contested the action by denying plaintiff’s claims and by asserting as an affirmative defense that plaintiff could not gain *636 title to, nor a prescriptive easement over, the parcel because lands given to a public use are exempted from adverse possession claims by 12…”
Benson v. Hodgdon, 2010 VT 11 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 3דBecause a nonstatutory method for creating a road exists via dedication and acceptance, defendants argue “a non-statutory method to discontinue a road through abandonment should likewise exist.”
In re .88 Acres of Prop. Owned by the Town of Shelburne, 676 A.2d 788 (Vt. 1996). “” 12 V.S.A. § 462. In appellants’ view, because the subject property was given for a public use, and has since been used or appropriated for public purposes, the limitations period in § 501 does not apply, and thus the Town may not obtain the property by adverse possession.”
Roy, Hirschbuhl, Barr v. Woodstock Cmty. Trust, Inc. (Vt. 2013). · cites it 18ד” 12 V.S.A. § 462. As the parcels had been owned from 1981 to 2005 by a church, the trial court found that the time for determining adverse possession could not include the time in which the property was owned by the church and, therefore, commenced in 2005.”
Macri v. Cooke's Letters, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 9דDefendant counters that Plaintiffs cannot receive a prescriptive easement over Defendant’s property because Defendant leases all of its property to the Post Office and is therefore protected by 12 V.S.A. § 462. Defendant admits that it is a for-profit corporation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.