Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 465 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERALLY

(Cite as: 12 V.S.A. § 465)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: In re Est. of Alden v. Alden v. Alden, 2011 VT 64 (Vt. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Est. of Alden v. Alden v. Alden, 2011 VT 64 (Vt. 2011). “Before the trial court, defendants relied solely on 12 V.S.A. § 465 to claim the sixty-day provision was “null and void.”
Bergman v. Spruce Peak Realty, LLC, 847 F. Supp. 2d 653 (D. Vt. 2012). “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 465 . 10 As to the validity of the Declaration’s one-year limit, briefly, Plaintiffs do not bring their claims in this docket under the Declaration.”
Pieciak (D. Vt. 2026). · cites it 6× “§ 465 (“Except as otherwise provided by statute, any provision in a contract which limits the time in which an action may be brought under the contract or which waives the statute of limitations shall be null and void.”). Although this appears to present a clear conflict of law,…”
Pieciak v. Crowe LLP (D. Vt. 2022). “” 12 V.S.A. § 465. Under Illinois law, however, “[t]he parties to a contract may agree to a shortened contractual limitation period to replace a statute of limitations, so long as it is reasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.