When the lessee of lands or tenements, either by parole or written lease, or a person
holding under the lease, holds possession of the demised premises without right, after
the termination of the lease by its own limitation or after breach of a stipulation
contained in the lease by the lessee or a person holding under the lessee, the person
entitled to the possession of the premises may have from the presiding judge of the
Superior Court a writ to restore him or her to the possession thereof. (Amended 1971, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 138, eff. March 29, 1972; 1973, No. 249 (Adj. Sess.), § 28, eff. April 9, 1974; 1989, No. 221 (Adj. Sess.), § 7, eff. Oct. 1, 1990.)
Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2ד§§ 4451-4469, the action for possession must be brought pursuant to the ejectment statute in chapter 169 of Title 12, normally 12 V.S.A. §4851. See 9 V.S.A. §4468 (granting landlords an action for possession under Title 12 if tenant remains in possession after termination of the…”
State v. Fisher, 360 A.2d 102 (Vt. 1976). · cites it 4דThe State of Vermont commenced a district court ejectment action, 12 V.S.A. § 4851, in the District Court of Vermont, Unit No.”
Gabriel Handy v. Kelly Fiske & Kayla Currier, 2023 VT 46 (Vt. 2023). · cites it 2ד§ 4467(a), the claim he filed was a single count for ejectment under 12 V.S.A. § 4851. See Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48, ¶ 14 , 178 Vt.”
In re Appeal of Dezarae Durkee, 171 A.3d 33 (Vt. 2017). “" 12 V.S.A. § 4851. In suggesting that applicant could remain in possession of the premises until served with a writ of possession, the Board conflated a tenant's potential legal right to continued possession of the premises with the practical reality that the process by which…”
Anello v. Vinci, 458 A.2d 1117 (Vt. 1983). “§ 4761, or a district court ejectment action, 12 V.S.A. § 4851.”
Est. of Emilo v. St. Pierre, 505 A.2d 664 (Vt. 1985). “On November 8, 1982, plaintiff filed a complaint requesting that the district court order defendants ejected from certain property allegedly owned by plaintiff, 12 V.S.A. § 4851, and issue a writ of possession to restore plaintiff to possession of that property.”
In Re Couture, 202 B.R. 837 (Bankr. D. Vt. 1996). “12 V.S.A. § 4851. The Writ of Possession is a judicial determination that Debtors have no rights, and an order that they be turned out.”
Costa v. Katsanos, 664 A.2d 251 (Vt. 1995). “On February 8,1988, plaintiffs began a justice ejectment action pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 4851 in Windsor District Court seeking possession of the property and damages.”
Strengowski v. Gomes, 268 A.2d 749 (Vt. 1970). “According to their contract, the status of the plaintiffs is that of vendors.”
Deblasio v. Hathaway (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2ד“[T]he action for possession must be brought pursuant to the ejectment statute in chapter 169 of Title 12, normally 12 V.S.A. § 4851.” Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48, ¶ 10 , 178 Vt.”
Bergeron v. Boyle, 2003 VT 89 (2003). “2d 102,104 (1976) (district court ejectment action brought under 12 V.S.A. § 4851 not a proceeding to establish or settle title to land and did not implicate “concerning real estate” language of § 402(a)); Estate of Emilo v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.