Notes of Decisions
Cited in
104
cases (
11 in the last 5 years), 1974–2026 · leading case:
State v. Roy, 557 A.2d 884 (Vt. 1989).
State v. Roy, 557 A.2d 884 (Vt. 1989).
· cites it 6× “Defendant appeals his conviction of simple assault on a police officer, 13 V.S.A. §§ 1023(a) and 1028, attempting to elude a police officer, 23 V.”
State v. Russell, 2011 VT 36, 22 A.3d 455.
· cites it 4× “§ 1024(a)(2), and one count of attempted aggravated assault, also under § 1024(a)(2).”
State v. Breed, 2015 VT 43, 117 A.3d 829.
· cites it 4× “§ 1376(b), may be imprisoned for not more than two years or fined not more than $2000, or both, while a person convicted of simple assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(b) may be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined more than $1000, or both.”
State v. Sturgeon, 436 A.2d 777 (Vt. 1981).
· cites it 7× “By agreement of the parties, who believe 13 V.S.A. § 1023 (b) sets forth a lesser included crime of simple assault by mutual consent, the court submitted the case to the jury with instructions relating to the evidence on a greater and a lesser offense.”
State v. David Tracy, 2015 VT 111, 130 A.3d 196.
“The State initially charged defendant with two misdemeanor offenses: simple assault by physical menace under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(3) (“A person is guilty of simple assault if he or she .”
State v. Hoadley, 512 A.2d 879 (Vt. 1986).
· cites it 3× “Defendant Blanche Hoadley was convicted, after trial by jury, of (1) simple assault in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1), and (2) simple assault on a law enforcement officer in violation of 13 V.”
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25, 995 A.2d 557.
· cites it 2× “Galvin, the defendant was charged with assault on a police officer, and we held that the elements of the crime were wholly defined by the simple assault statute, 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1), and that § 1028, setting a higher penalty if the crime was against a law enforcement officer,…”
State v. Ramsay, 499 A.2d 15 (Vt. 1985).
· cites it 2× “Defendant was convicted at a trial by jury of two counts of simple assault in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1). He raises three claims on appeal: (1) the United States and Vermont Constitutions bar the charges on double jeopardy grounds; (2) prosecutorial impropriety deprived…”
State v. Bourn, 421 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1980).
· cites it 3× “On appeal his sole claim of error is that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court refused to instruct the jury on the elements of simple assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1). The thrust of the defendant’s argument is that simple assault is a lesser included offense of…”
State v. Elkins, 580 A.2d 1200 (Vt. 1990).
· cites it 3× “Defendant contends that his entry into his residence ended the deputy’s lawful duty and left the deputy without authority to proceed onto defendant’s property. Therefore, defendant argues that the State could not prove that the deputy was assaulted while performing a lawful…”
State v. McLaren, 376 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1977).
· cites it 2× “§ 1025; and simple assault, 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1). A trial by jury in the District Court of Vermont, Unit No.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1023(A)(3): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1023(a): 19 cases
State v. Roy, 557 A.2d 884 (Vt. 1989).
“Defendant appeals his conviction of simple assault on a police officer, 13 V.S.A. §§ 1023(a) and 1028, attempting to elude a police officer, 23 V.”
State v. Sturgeon, 436 A.2d 777 (Vt. 1981).
“By agreement of the parties, who believe 13 V.S.A. § 1023 (b) sets forth a lesser included crime of simple assault by mutual consent, the court submitted the case to the jury with instructions relating to the evidence on a greater and a lesser offense.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1023(a)(1): 43 cases
State v. Roy, 557 A.2d 884 (Vt. 1989).
“Defendant appeals his conviction of simple assault on a police officer, 13 V.S.A. §§ 1023(a) and 1028, attempting to elude a police officer, 23 V.”
State v. Hoadley, 512 A.2d 879 (Vt. 1986).
“Defendant Blanche Hoadley was convicted, after trial by jury, of (1) simple assault in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1), and (2) simple assault on a law enforcement officer in violation of 13 V.”
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25, 995 A.2d 557.
“Galvin, the defendant was charged with assault on a police officer, and we held that the elements of the crime were wholly defined by the simple assault statute, 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1), and that § 1028, setting a higher penalty if the crime was against a law enforcement officer,…”
State v. Ramsay, 499 A.2d 15 (Vt. 1985).
“Defendant was convicted at a trial by jury of two counts of simple assault in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1). He raises three claims on appeal: (1) the United States and Vermont Constitutions bar the charges on double jeopardy grounds; (2) prosecutorial impropriety deprived…”
State v. Bourn, 421 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1980).
“On appeal his sole claim of error is that he was denied a fair trial because the trial court refused to instruct the jury on the elements of simple assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(1). The thrust of the defendant’s argument is that simple assault is a lesser included offense of…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1023(a)(2): 1 case
State v. Russell, 2011 VT 36, 22 A.3d 455.
“§ 1024(a)(2), and one count of attempted aggravated assault, also under § 1024(a)(2).”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1023(a)(3): 14 cases
State v. David Tracy, 2015 VT 111, 130 A.3d 196.
“The State initially charged defendant with two misdemeanor offenses: simple assault by physical menace under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(a)(3) (“A person is guilty of simple assault if he or she .”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1023(b): 12 cases
State v. Breed, 2015 VT 43, 117 A.3d 829.
“§ 1376(b), may be imprisoned for not more than two years or fined not more than $2000, or both, while a person convicted of simple assault under 13 V.S.A. § 1023(b) may be imprisoned for not more than one year or fined more than $1000, or both.”
State v. Sturgeon, 436 A.2d 777 (Vt. 1981).
“By agreement of the parties, who believe 13 V.S.A. § 1023 (b) sets forth a lesser included crime of simple assault by mutual consent, the court submitted the case to the jury with instructions relating to the evidence on a greater and a lesser offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.