Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 11 (2026)
Habitual criminals
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 11)
-
§ 11. Habitual criminals
A person who, after having been three times convicted within this State of felonies or attempts to commit felonies, or under the law of any other state, government, or country, of crimes which, if committed within this State, would be felonious, commits a felony other than murder within this State, may be sentenced upon conviction of such fourth or subsequent offense to imprisonment up to and including life. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1995, No. 50, § 1.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 60
cases (11 in the last 5 years), 1964–2025 · leading case: State v. Pellerin, 2010 VT 26 (Vt. 2010).
State v. Pellerin, 2010 VT 26 (Vt. 2010). “The State argues that, because defendant was given notice of the possibility of life imprisonment under Vermont's habitual offender statute, 13 V.S.A. § 11, defendant faces charges punishable by life imprisonment.”
State v. Ingerson, 2004 VT 36 (Vt. 2004). “Defendant was convicted of burglarizing Walker’s Restaurant in Brattleboro, Vermont and received an enhanced sentence of twenty to thirty years of imprisonment as a habitual offender under 13 V.S.A. § 11. Defendant appeals both the conviction and sentence, claiming that (1) he…”
State v. Rideout, 933 A.2d 706 (Vt. 2007). “If defendant’s four felony convictions from 1979 had not been counted, he would have had only two prior felonies, and could not have been sentenced as a habitual criminal.”
State v. Carpenter, 2013 VT 28 (Vt. 2013). “Section 11 generally provides that a person already convicted of three felonies may, upon a fourth or subsequent felony conviction, be sentenced “to imprisonment up to and including life.”
State v. Angelucci, 405 A.2d 33 (Vt. 1979). “He was also charged under the habitual offender statute, 13 V.S.A. § 11. This issue was presented to the jury and resulted in conviction after completion of the original felony *276 trial.”
State v. Brillon, 2008 VT 35 (Vt. 2008). “See 13 V.S.A. § 11. ¶ 10. Three days after the July 27, 2001 incident, the district court issued a no-bail order, and defendant remained incarcerated.”
State v. Joshua Boyer, 2021 VT 19 (Vt. 2021). “77, § 6. Presumably in response, on October 16, 2019, the aggravated assault charge was amended to first-degree aggravated domestic assault under 13 V.”
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25 (Vt. 2010). “See 13 V.S.A. § 11. ¶ 3. Following his arrest in July 2001, defendant was held on a no-bail order until his case was finally tried in June 2004.”
State v. Kasper, 404 A.2d 85 (Vt. 1979). “Part B charged him with being an “habitual criminal” in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 11. The trial court, relying on the habitual criminal statute, sentenced the defendant to three life terms, one for each conviction.”
State v. Jonas, 792 P.2d 705 (Ariz. 1990). “18 § 4224(h); with 3 priors, natural life, Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13 § 11; Virginia, 50 years, Va.”
State v. Beaudoin, 2008 VT 133 (Vt. 2008). “13 V.S.A. § 11. After the jury reached a verdict on the two counts of lewd or lascivious conduct with a child, defendant waived his right to a jury trial on the habitual-offender charge.”
State v. Setien, 795 A.2d 1135 (Vt. 2002). “§§ 9, 608, and as a habitual offender, 13 V.S.A. § 11, claiming that (1) he was denied his right to testify because the trial court ruled in limine that the State could impeach defendant with evidence of his past criminal convictions; (2) he was convicted of two crimes but…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.