Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2822 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 2822)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2004 · leading case: Purcell v. Commonwealth, 149 S.W.3d 382 (Ky. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Purcell v. Commonwealth, 149 S.W.3d 382 (Ky. 2004). · cites it 2× “25; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13 § 2822; Wis. Stat.”
TBH by & Through Howard v. Meyer, 716 A.2d 31 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 3× “While the girls were in defendant’s jacuzzi, defendant took nude photographs and video tape of the two girls.”
State v. Voorheis, 2004 VT 10 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 2× “Delisle to use her daughter in a sexual performance in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2822, and/or to consent to her daughter’s participation in a sexual performance in violation of 13 V.”
State v. Searles, 621 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1993). “” 13 V.S.A. § 2822(b). Again, we presume that like language would have been included in § 3252(a)(3) had the Legislature intended the defense to be available.”
State v. Meyer, 708 A.2d 1343 (Vt. 1998). “Based on the discovery of this evidence, defendant was arrested and charged with two counts of promoting a performance including the lewd exhibition of the genitals of a child in violation of 13 VS.A. § 2822(a). Defendant seeks to suppress the evidence seized, claiming that the…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2822(a) — 2 cases
TBH by & Through Howard v. Meyer, 716 A.2d 31 (Vt. 1998). “While the girls were in defendant’s jacuzzi, defendant took nude photographs and video tape of the two girls.”
State v. Meyer, 708 A.2d 1343 (Vt. 1998). “Based on the discovery of this evidence, defendant was arrested and charged with two counts of promoting a performance including the lewd exhibition of the genitals of a child in violation of 13 VS.A. § 2822(a). Defendant seeks to suppress the evidence seized, claiming that the…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2822(b) — 1 case
State v. Searles, 621 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1993). “” 13 V.S.A. § 2822(b). Again, we presume that like language would have been included in § 3252(a)(3) had the Legislature intended the defense to be available.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.