Notes of Decisions
Cited in
127
cases (
32 in the last 5 years), 1968–2026 · leading case:
State v. Stephen White, 2020 VT 62, 237 A.3d 1235.
State v. Stephen White, 2020 VT 62, 237 A.3d 1235.
· cites it 5× “2 Additionally, subsection (e) demonstrates the Legislature’s intent that “[a] person held without bail prior to trial shall be entitled to review of that determination,” and does not contain any limits on its face as to whether defendant must appeal 1 The State initially filed…”
State v. Malik A. Pratt, 2017 VT 9, 166 A.3d 600.
· cites it 3× “Given these standards, and the broad discretion trial courts enjoy in these cases, we conclude that the trial court's bail decision is "supported by the proceedings below," 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b). We accordingly affirm.”
State v. Blackmer, 631 A.2d 1134 (Vt. 1993).
· cites it 3× “See 13 V.S.A. § 7556. [3] We recognize, as the dissent argues, that this relationship may not hold true if the Legislature adopts a theoretical life imprisonment punishment for crimes where there is no serious risk any defendant will ever be sentenced to life imprisonment.”
In re Russo, 2013 VT 35, 72 A.3d 900.
· cites it 4× “See 13 V.S.A. § 7556(d) (granting right to second evidentiary hearing before a single justice when bail is denied under § 7553a); V.”
State v. Duff, 563 A.2d 258 (Vt. 1989).
· cites it 2× “Since we are unable to find that the trial court decision is “supported by the proceedings below,” 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b), we *434 reverse and remand for further fact-finding and a more complete decision consistent with the standards set forth in this opinion.”
State v. Madison, 658 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1995).
· cites it 2× “13 V.S.A. § 7556(b) (district court’s order detaining person pending trial “shall be affirmed if it is supported by the proceedings below”).”
State v. Aaron Lontine, 2016 VT 26, 142 A.3d 1058.
· cites it 2× “If that alone were sufficient to set a high cash bail amount, the constitutional right to bail would be a nullity for all defendants charged with serious crimes.”
State v. James C. Lohr, 2020 VT 41, 236 A.3d 1277.
“The State appeals under 13 V.S.A. § 7556(c), arguing that the court was 1 Defendant appealed that decision, and a single Justice affirmed.”
State v. Jay Orost, 2017 VT 110, 179 A.3d 763.
“-the target of the alleged sexual abuse-was admissible and sufficient evidence of defendant's guilt, and whether the court should exercise discretion and allow bail despite the seriousness of the charges and the additional charges in the newly arraigned dockets.”
State v. Cardinal, 520 A.2d 984 (Vt. 1986).
· cites it 2× “This is an appeal under 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b) and V.R.A.P. 9(a) from a bail order of the trial court forfeiting the defendant’s originally posted bail and imposing additional $250,000 bail.”
State v. Travis C. Collins, Sr., 2017 VT 85, 177 A.3d 528.
“§ 7575, which permits revocation of the right to bail under certain enumerated circumstances, or the State could appeal a trial court's bail decision to this Court pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7556(c). Id . ¶ 8. We affirmed the trial court's final decision holding the defendant…”
State v. Parda, 455 A.2d 323 (Vt. 1982).
· cites it 3× “13 V.S.A. § 7556 (b). Although defendant’s argument is ingenious, there is no support in the new statute for his contention that the trial court is prohibited from imposing monetary bail condi *263 tions for release pending interlocutory appeal.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7556(a): 2 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7556(b): 72 cases
State v. Malik A. Pratt, 2017 VT 9, 166 A.3d 600.
“Given these standards, and the broad discretion trial courts enjoy in these cases, we conclude that the trial court's bail decision is "supported by the proceedings below," 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b). We accordingly affirm.”
State v. Duff, 563 A.2d 258 (Vt. 1989).
“Since we are unable to find that the trial court decision is “supported by the proceedings below,” 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b), we *434 reverse and remand for further fact-finding and a more complete decision consistent with the standards set forth in this opinion.”
State v. Cardinal, 520 A.2d 984 (Vt. 1986).
“This is an appeal under 13 V.S.A. § 7556(b) and V.R.A.P. 9(a) from a bail order of the trial court forfeiting the defendant’s originally posted bail and imposing additional $250,000 bail.”
State v. Madison, 658 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1995).
“13 V.S.A. § 7556(b) (district court’s order detaining person pending trial “shall be affirmed if it is supported by the proceedings below”).”
State v. Blackmer, 631 A.2d 1134 (Vt. 1993).
“See 13 V.S.A. § 7556. [3] We recognize, as the dissent argues, that this relationship may not hold true if the Legislature adopts a theoretical life imprisonment punishment for crimes where there is no serious risk any defendant will ever be sentenced to life imprisonment.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7556(c): 20 cases
State v. James C. Lohr, 2020 VT 41, 236 A.3d 1277.
“The State appeals under 13 V.S.A. § 7556(c), arguing that the court was 1 Defendant appealed that decision, and a single Justice affirmed.”
State v. Travis C. Collins, Sr., 2017 VT 85, 177 A.3d 528.
“§ 7575, which permits revocation of the right to bail under certain enumerated circumstances, or the State could appeal a trial court's bail decision to this Court pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7556(c). Id . ¶ 8. We affirmed the trial court's final decision holding the defendant…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7556(d): 28 cases
In re Russo, 2013 VT 35, 72 A.3d 900.
“See 13 V.S.A. § 7556(d) (granting right to second evidentiary hearing before a single justice when bail is denied under § 7553a); V.”
State v. Madison, 658 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1995).
“13 V.S.A. § 7556(b) (district court’s order detaining person pending trial “shall be affirmed if it is supported by the proceedings below”).”
State v. Stephen White, 2020 VT 62, 237 A.3d 1235.
“2 Additionally, subsection (e) demonstrates the Legislature’s intent that “[a] person held without bail prior to trial shall be entitled to review of that determination,” and does not contain any limits on its face as to whether defendant must appeal 1 The State initially filed…”
State v. Aaron Lontine, 2016 VT 26, 142 A.3d 1058.
“If that alone were sufficient to set a high cash bail amount, the constitutional right to bail would be a nullity for all defendants charged with serious crimes.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7556(e): 13 cases
State v. Stephen White, 2020 VT 62, 237 A.3d 1235.
“2 Additionally, subsection (e) demonstrates the Legislature’s intent that “[a] person held without bail prior to trial shall be entitled to review of that determination,” and does not contain any limits on its face as to whether defendant must appeal 1 The State initially filed…”
In re Russo, 2013 VT 35, 72 A.3d 900.
“See 13 V.S.A. § 7556(d) (granting right to second evidentiary hearing before a single justice when bail is denied under § 7553a); V.”
State v. Jay Orost, 2017 VT 110, 179 A.3d 763.
“-the target of the alleged sexual abuse-was admissible and sufficient evidence of defendant's guilt, and whether the court should exercise discretion and allow bail despite the seriousness of the charges and the additional charges in the newly arraigned dockets.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.