The right to bail may be revoked entirely if the judicial officer finds that the accused
has:
(1) intimidated or harassed a victim, potential witness, juror, or judicial officer in
violation of a condition of release; or
(2) repeatedly violated conditions of release in a manner that impedes the prosecution
of the accused; or
(3) violated a condition or conditions of release that constitute a threat to the integrity
of the judicial system; or
(4) without just cause, failed to appear at a specified time and place ordered by a judicial
officer; or
(5) in violation of a condition of release, been charged with a felony or a crime against
a person or an offense similar to the underlying charge, for which, after hearing,
probable cause is found. (Added 1989, No. 293 (Adj. Sess.), § 2; amended 2017, No. 164 (Adj. Sess.), § 4.)
State v. Sauve, 621 A.2d 1296 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 5דThe trial court concluded revocation was warranted under three separate prongs of 13 V.S.A. § 7575. It stated that on September 11, defendant intimidated and harassed the complaining witness, 13 V.”
State v. Blackmer, 631 A.2d 1134 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 2דSee 13 V.S.A. § 7575. When the need for conditions is viewed in light of the possible punishment of life imprisonment, it is entirely appropriate for the court to deny bail unless it is fully convinced that the defendant will abide by the conditions that would be imposed if…”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 2דSee 13 V.S.A. § 7575(1); Wood, 157 Vt. at 290 , 597 A.”
State v. Travis C. Collins, Sr., 177 A.3d 528 (Vt. 2017). “Id . ¶ 8. We affirmed the trial court's final decision holding the defendant without bail, stating that "[n]othing in the plain language of § 7553 prevents a trial court from engaging in [a new] evidentiary analysis as the weight of evidence changes.”
State v. Jeremy Gates, 2016 VT 36 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 5דDefendant appeals from a February 1, 2016 ruling of the superior court revoking his right to bail under 13 V.S.A. § 7575 after repeated violations of conditions of release (VCRs).”
State v. Tyreke Morton, 2018 VT 22 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2דIn an after-hours order issued in the early morning hours, Judge VanBenthuysen imposed a surety bond or cash in the amount of $150,000, as well as other conditions of release.”
State v. Brooks, 2015 VT 13 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 2דThe next day, defendant’s bail was revoked pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7575. Eight days later, the court held a hearing to review the revocation of bail.”
State v. Blow, 2015 VT 143 (Vt. 2015). “Defendant contends that, once bail was granted on September 5, 2014, the State could reverse the decision only via two procedural devices: revocation of bail pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 7575 or appeal of the bail decision to this Court under 13 V.”
State v. Huseboe, 607 A.2d 1140 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 4דFor this reason, we remand this matter to the district court for a hearing in compliance with 13 V.S.A. § 7575 on the question of probable cause, at which defendant will have an opportunity to present evidence on the issue.”
State v. Wood, 597 A.2d 312 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 2דBut the court could not revoke bail under the authority of 13 V.S.A. § 7575 for the simple reason that this was not a revocation proceeding and there was nothing to revoke.”
State v. Plant, 686 A.2d 941 (Vt. 1996). · cites it 3דI conclude by cleai’ and convincing evidence that bail was properly withheld under § 7553a, as well as under 13 V.S.A. § 7575. The record evidence reveals that defendant engaged in a rapidly escalating campaign of harassment, intimidation and physical assault against Cynthia…”
State of Vermont v. Angela M. Auclair, 2020 VT 26 (Vt. 2020). “” 13 V.S.A. § 7575(1), (3). In Suave, we determined that neither condition was met where a witness was merely “in danger of contact by the defendant.”
State v. Sauve, 621 A.2d 1296 (Vt. 1993). “The trial court concluded revocation was warranted under three separate prongs of 13 V.S.A. § 7575. It stated that on September 11, defendant intimidated and harassed the complaining witness, 13 V.”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). “See 13 V.S.A. § 7575(1); Wood, 157 Vt. at 290 , 597 A.”
State v. Wood, 597 A.2d 312 (Vt. 1991). “But the court could not revoke bail under the authority of 13 V.S.A. § 7575 for the simple reason that this was not a revocation proceeding and there was nothing to revoke.”
State of Vermont v. Angela M. Auclair, 2020 VT 26 (Vt. 2020). “” 13 V.S.A. § 7575(1), (3). In Suave, we determined that neither condition was met where a witness was merely “in danger of contact by the defendant.”
State v. Sauve, 621 A.2d 1296 (Vt. 1993). “The trial court concluded revocation was warranted under three separate prongs of 13 V.S.A. § 7575. It stated that on September 11, defendant intimidated and harassed the complaining witness, 13 V.”
State v. Sauve, 621 A.2d 1296 (Vt. 1993). “The trial court concluded revocation was warranted under three separate prongs of 13 V.S.A. § 7575. It stated that on September 11, defendant intimidated and harassed the complaining witness, 13 V.”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). “See 13 V.S.A. § 7575(1); Wood, 157 Vt. at 290 , 597 A.”
State v. Huseboe, 607 A.2d 1140 (Vt. 1992). “For this reason, we remand this matter to the district court for a hearing in compliance with 13 V.S.A. § 7575 on the question of probable cause, at which defendant will have an opportunity to present evidence on the issue.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.