Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14A, § 603 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(Cite as: 14A V.S.A. § 603)

§ 603. Settlor’s powers; powers of withdrawal

(a) While a trust is revocable, rights of the beneficiaries are subject to the control of, and the duties of the trustee are owed exclusively to, the settlor.

(b) During the period the power may be exercised, the holder of a power of withdrawal has the rights of a settlor of a revocable trust under this section to the extent of the property subject to the power. (Added 2009, No. 20, § 1.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: Michael Collins v. Lynn B. Collins, 173 A.3d 345 (Vt. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Michael Collins v. Lynn B. Collins, 173 A.3d 345 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 2× “14A V.S.A. § 603(a). Husband does not dispute that father changed the beneficiary to the parties' son in order to bypass husband as a beneficiary, thereby keeping the trust property out of the marital estate.”

In Re Trust of Marsha Milot (Jennifer Milot, Appellant), 2026 VT 7 (Vt. 2026). · cites it 3× “Petitioner claims the probate division erred by: failing to apply the correct legal standard when deciding to dismiss petitioner’s action; failing to consider whether petitioner’s information requests were “unreasonable under the circumstances” as required by statute; and…”

in re pratt (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “14A V.S.A. § 603(a); Bogert’s Law of Trusts and Trustees § 1061.”

— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 14A, § 603(a) — 2 cases

Michael Collins v. Lynn B. Collins, 173 A.3d 345 (Vt. 2017). “14A V.S.A. § 603(a). Husband does not dispute that father changed the beneficiary to the parties' son in order to bypass husband as a beneficiary, thereby keeping the trust property out of the marital estate.”

in re pratt (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “14A V.S.A. § 603(a); Bogert’s Law of Trusts and Trustees § 1061.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.