Paquette v. Paquette, 499 A.2d 23 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 4דFinally, even if we were unable to garner the legislative intent from the plain meaning of the statute's terms, a comparison of § 652(a)'s predecessor, 15 V.S.A. § 292, with § 652(a) evidences an intent to change the effect of the law.”
White v. White, 450 A.2d 1108 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 3דOn January 30, 1981, the defendant moved pursuant to 15 V.S.A. § 292 and V.R.C.P. 80(j) for a modification of the divorce order in regard to support, asking that his payments *501 be reduced to $20 per month, and that the automatic annual increase be eliminated.”
Palmer v. Palmer, 416 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 2דSee 15 V.S.A. § 292. In the instant case, defendant has not shown that the trial court's discretion, in awarding plaintiff custody, was erroneously exercised, Boone v.”
Hayes v. Hayes, 476 A.2d 135 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2דPreviously, modification of child custody orders was available under 15 V.S.A. § 292 (repealed July 1, 1982; 1981 No.”
Cavallari v. Martin, 732 A.2d 739 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 2דAfter the entry of the original decree, the Court has the power under 15 V.S.A. § 292 to make, modify or revise its orders concerning the custody and support of minor children.”
West v. West, 312 A.2d 920 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 2דThe plaintiff’s position is that the defendant’s motion to amend judgment order pursuant to V.R.C.P. 59(e) was improperly sought and improperly granted.”
Beaudry v. Beaudry, 312 A.2d 922 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 2דThe judicial authority specifically involved here is derived from 15 V.S.A. § 292, which reads as follows: When a marriage is annulled or a divorce granted and at any time thereafter, upon petition of either of the parents, the court may make such other or further decree as it…”
Forte v. Forte, 468 A.2d 561 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 2דRelying on 15 V.S.A. §§ 292 and 760, the court also ordered plaintiff to pay arrearages of $6,000.”
Lumbra v. Lumbra, 394 A.2d 1139 (Vt. 1978). “15 V.S.A. § 292 provides: When a marriage is annulled or a divorce granted, and at any time thereafter, upon petition of either of the parents, the court may make such other or further decree as it deems expedient concerning the care, custody and maintenance of the minor…”
Boone v. Boone, 333 A.2d 98 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 2דHis evidence was not persuasive to the trier, whose duty it was, under 15 V.S.A. § 292, to decide which of the parents was to have custody.”
Bushway v. Riendeau, 407 A.2d 178 (Vt. 1979). “bind the obligor present in this state regardless of the presence or residence of the obligee.” Section 30, 15 V.S.A. § 418, specifically demands that the “responding court shall not stay the proceeding or refuse a hearing under this chapter because of any pending or prior…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.