Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 15B Chapter 2
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15B, § 201 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter A : EXTENDED PERSONAL JURISDICTION

(Cite as: 15B V.S.A. § 201)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2007–2014 · leading case: Pahnke v. Pahnke, 2014 VT 2 (Vt. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pahnke v. Pahnke, 2014 VT 2 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 3× “See Official Comment, 15B V.S.A. § 201 (stating that intent of § 201 is to insure that state has long-arm statute as broad as constitutionally permitted).”
OCS/Pappas v. O'Brien & Bernheim v. Pappas, 2013 VT 11 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 15B V.S.A. § 201. In the present case, when father obtained custody of P.”
Bergman v. Marker, 2007 VT 139 (Vt. 2007). “On appeal, the family court ruled that Vermont could exercise jurisdiction under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), 15B V.S.A. §201(3), (6), because mother had resided in Vermont with the child and the child was conceived in Vermont.”
Pahnke/Off. of Child Support v. Pahnke, 195 Vt. 394 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 3× “See Official Comment, 15B V.S.A. § 201 (stating that intent of § 201 is to insure that state has long-arm statute as broad as constitutionally permitted).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15B, § 201(2) — 1 case
OCS/Pappas v. O'Brien & Bernheim v. Pappas, 2013 VT 11 (Vt. 2013). “See 15B V.S.A. § 201. In the present case, when father obtained custody of P.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15B, § 201(3) — 1 case
Bergman v. Marker, 2007 VT 139 (Vt. 2007). “On appeal, the family court ruled that Vermont could exercise jurisdiction under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA), 15B V.S.A. §201(3), (6), because mother had resided in Vermont with the child and the child was conceived in Vermont.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15B, § 201(5) — 2 cases
Pahnke v. Pahnke, 2014 VT 2 (Vt. 2014). “See Official Comment, 15B V.S.A. § 201 (stating that intent of § 201 is to insure that state has long-arm statute as broad as constitutionally permitted).”
Pahnke/Off. of Child Support v. Pahnke, 195 Vt. 394 (Vt. 2014). “See Official Comment, 15B V.S.A. § 201 (stating that intent of § 201 is to insure that state has long-arm statute as broad as constitutionally permitted).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15B, § 201(7) — 2 cases
Pahnke v. Pahnke, 2014 VT 2 (Vt. 2014). “See Official Comment, 15B V.S.A. § 201 (stating that intent of § 201 is to insure that state has long-arm statute as broad as constitutionally permitted).”
Pahnke/Off. of Child Support v. Pahnke, 195 Vt. 394 (Vt. 2014). “See Official Comment, 15B V.S.A. § 201 (stating that intent of § 201 is to insure that state has long-arm statute as broad as constitutionally permitted).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.