In all cases for which no other provision has been made, the Superior Court shall
have general jurisdiction to hear and determine matters relating to elections and
to fashion appropriate relief. (Added 1977, No. 269 (Adj. Sess.), § 1.)
Kennedy v. Chittenden, 457 A.2d 626 (Vt. 1983). “1 17 V.S.A. § 2617 purports to confer general jurisdiction on the superior court “to hear and determine matters relating to elections and to fashion appropriate relief.”
roxbury v. montpelier-roxbury (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 2ד§ 1 The catch-all statute, 17 V.S.A. § 2617, presumably would apply if § 2603 did not.”
Paige v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 2ד§2603 (Contests of Elections), 17 V.S.A. § 2617 (Jurisdiction of Superior Courts), 12 V.”
Noble v. Sec'y of State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). · cites it 2דSee 17 V.S.A. § 2617. (a) The result of an election for any office .”
petition of morse (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “17 V.S.A. §2617 | authorizes this court to determine matters relating to elections and fashion appropriate relief in cases for which no other provision has been made.”
Paige v. Copeland-Hanzas (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “17 V.S.A. § 2617; see Anderson v. Celebrezze, 460 U.”
H. Brooke Paige v. State of Vermont & Sarah Copeland-Hanzas (Vt. 2026). “§ 2603, which allows “any legal voter” to contest the “result of an election for any office,” and 17 V.S.A. § 2617, which grants the superior court jurisdiction “to hear and determine matters relating to elections.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.