Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 18 Chapter 3
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 127 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 127)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: Town of Milton Bd. of Health v. Armand Brisson, 2016 VT 56 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Town of Milton Bd. of Health v. Armand Brisson, 2016 VT 56 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 18 V.S.A. § 127(a) (“A health officer may, without a prior hearing, issue an emergency health order when necessary to prevent, remove, or destroy an imminent and substantial public health hazard, or to mitigate an imminent and substantial significant public health risk.”
Dean v. Town of Hartford, Vermont (D. Vt. 2025). · cites it 5× “18 V.S.A. § 127.!! With that background in mind, the court next considers the Town’s arguments for summary judgment on the Monell claims.”
Dean v. Town of Hartford, Vermont (D. Vt. 2025). · cites it 2× “§ 126] and also not reviewing or conducting hearings on Emergency Health Orders [under 18 V.S.A. § 127].” (Doc. 81 at 3.) The court concluded that the Town was entitled to summary judgment on the Monell claims, reasoning that “even accepting that the Town had a practice or…”
Brattleboro v. Hunter (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” 18 V.S.A. § 127(a). Health orders issued under either statute may require any person responsible for contributing to the public health hazard or significant public health risk to take actions to protect the public health.”
Brattleboro v. Hunter (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” 18 V.S.A. § 127(a). Health orders issued under either statute may require any person responsible for contributing to the public health hazard or significant public health risk to take actions to protect the public health.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 127(a) — 3 cases
Town of Milton Bd. of Health v. Armand Brisson, 2016 VT 56 (Vt. 2016). “See 18 V.S.A. § 127(a) (“A health officer may, without a prior hearing, issue an emergency health order when necessary to prevent, remove, or destroy an imminent and substantial public health hazard, or to mitigate an imminent and substantial significant public health risk.”
Brattleboro v. Hunter (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” 18 V.S.A. § 127(a). Health orders issued under either statute may require any person responsible for contributing to the public health hazard or significant public health risk to take actions to protect the public health.”
Brattleboro v. Hunter (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” 18 V.S.A. § 127(a). Health orders issued under either statute may require any person responsible for contributing to the public health hazard or significant public health risk to take actions to protect the public health.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 127(c) — 2 cases
Dean v. Town of Hartford, Vermont (D. Vt. 2025). “18 V.S.A. § 127.!! With that background in mind, the court next considers the Town’s arguments for summary judgment on the Monell claims.”
Dean v. Town of Hartford, Vermont (D. Vt. 2025). “§ 126] and also not reviewing or conducting hearings on Emergency Health Orders [under 18 V.S.A. § 127].” (Doc. 81 at 3.) The court concluded that the Town was entitled to summary judgment on the Monell claims, reasoning that “even accepting that the Town had a practice or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.