Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 21 Chapter 17
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1321 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL BENEFITS

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1321)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1971–2020 · leading case: Chittenden Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 2020 VT 4 (Vt. 2020).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chittenden Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 2020 VT 4 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 5× “21 V.S.A. § 1321(e), (f). Unlike contributing employers, employers who make payments in lieu of tax contributions under the auspices of this provision are considered to be self-insuring and shall pay to the Commissioner for the .”
Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2× “” 21 V.S.A § 1321(f). Thus, the Department asserts that Vernon no longer has a legally cognizable stake in the outcome of the case because it will have to pay the Department regardless of whether it wins or loses on appeal.”
City of Burlington v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1987). · cites it 5× “Anyzeski next filed a claim for unemployment benefits on April 21, 1982, after he had worked for five months at the Sugarbush Ski Area, a “contributing employer” (21 V.S.A. § 1321(a)), from which he was laid off for lack of work in April 1982.”
Great N. Constr., Inc. v. Dep't of Labor, 2016 VT 126 (Vt. 2016). “See 21 V.S.A. §§ 1321, 1358. The central issue in this case, then, is whether O'Connor and LaPointe were employees of GNC under the statutory definition of "employment.”
Grenafege v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 357 A.2d 118 (Vt. 1976). “Thus, in 21 V.S.A. § 1321, relating to employer contributions, it used “employer” in its defined meaning in 21 V.”
863 To Go, Inc. v. Dep't of Labor, 2014 VT 61 (Vt. 2014). “In this case, employer initially contended that its drivers were self-employed persons whose services were exempt from the definition of employment under the so-called “ABC test” set forth in 21 V.S.A. § 1301(6)(B).”
Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 558 A.2d 226 (Vt. 1989). “The Unemployment Compensation Law, in order to provide a fund from which claims can be paid, taxes employers based on a portion of wages paid in each calendar year, 21 V.S.A. §§ 1321(a), (b), 1301(6) (1981), and on the basis of a benefit experience ratio computed by the…”
Windham Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 86 A.3d 410 (Vt. 2013). “” The notice also stated that “[a]ny employer liable to reimburse the fund for benefits paid in accordance with 21 V.S.A. § 1321(c)(5) cannot be relieved of charges by this determination.”
Times-Argus Ass'n v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 503 A.2d 129 (Vt. 1985). “” *322 Under 21 V.S.A. § 1321(a) employers subject to the unemployment compensation law are liable for contributions to the fund “with respect to wages paid for employment.”
In re Bourbeau Custom Homes, Inc., 171 A.3d 40 (Vt. 2017). “21 V.S.A. § 1321. Under the law, any "individual" who receives wages from an employer for performing services is presumed to be an employee.”
In re Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., Lodge 1090, 2005 VT 31 (Vt. 2005). “21 V.S.A. §§ 1321(a), (b), 1326(a). The benefit experience ratio is the quotient of the total benefits charged to the employer over a three-year period divided by the total of the taxable payroll for that same period.”
In re Cadieux, 285 A.2d 738 (Vt. 1971). “21 V.S.A. § 1321. Thereupon, Jerry Cadieux petitioned for a hearing before a referee, under the provisions of 21 V.”
Show all 13 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1321(a) — 4 cases
Sirloin Saloon of Shelburne, Rutland, & Manchester, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 558 A.2d 226 (Vt. 1989). “The Unemployment Compensation Law, in order to provide a fund from which claims can be paid, taxes employers based on a portion of wages paid in each calendar year, 21 V.S.A. §§ 1321(a), (b), 1301(6) (1981), and on the basis of a benefit experience ratio computed by the…”
City of Burlington v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1987). “Anyzeski next filed a claim for unemployment benefits on April 21, 1982, after he had worked for five months at the Sugarbush Ski Area, a “contributing employer” (21 V.S.A. § 1321(a)), from which he was laid off for lack of work in April 1982.”
Times-Argus Ass'n v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 503 A.2d 129 (Vt. 1985). “” *322 Under 21 V.S.A. § 1321(a) employers subject to the unemployment compensation law are liable for contributions to the fund “with respect to wages paid for employment.”
In re Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., Lodge 1090, 2005 VT 31 (Vt. 2005). “21 V.S.A. §§ 1321(a), (b), 1326(a). The benefit experience ratio is the quotient of the total benefits charged to the employer over a three-year period divided by the total of the taxable payroll for that same period.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1321(c)(5) — 2 cases
Windham Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 86 A.3d 410 (Vt. 2013). “” The notice also stated that “[a]ny employer liable to reimburse the fund for benefits paid in accordance with 21 V.S.A. § 1321(c)(5) cannot be relieved of charges by this determination.”
City of Burlington v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1987). “Anyzeski next filed a claim for unemployment benefits on April 21, 1982, after he had worked for five months at the Sugarbush Ski Area, a “contributing employer” (21 V.S.A. § 1321(a)), from which he was laid off for lack of work in April 1982.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1321(c)(5)(A) — 1 case
City of Burlington v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1987). “Anyzeski next filed a claim for unemployment benefits on April 21, 1982, after he had worked for five months at the Sugarbush Ski Area, a “contributing employer” (21 V.S.A. § 1321(a)), from which he was laid off for lack of work in April 1982.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1321(e) — 2 cases
City of Burlington v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1987). “Anyzeski next filed a claim for unemployment benefits on April 21, 1982, after he had worked for five months at the Sugarbush Ski Area, a “contributing employer” (21 V.S.A. § 1321(a)), from which he was laid off for lack of work in April 1982.”
Chittenden Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 2020 VT 4 (Vt. 2020). “21 V.S.A. § 1321(e), (f). Unlike contributing employers, employers who make payments in lieu of tax contributions under the auspices of this provision are considered to be self-insuring and shall pay to the Commissioner for the .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1321(f) — 2 cases
Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005). “” 21 V.S.A § 1321(f). Thus, the Department asserts that Vernon no longer has a legally cognizable stake in the outcome of the case because it will have to pay the Department regardless of whether it wins or loses on appeal.”
Chittenden Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 2020 VT 4 (Vt. 2020). “21 V.S.A. § 1321(e), (f). Unlike contributing employers, employers who make payments in lieu of tax contributions under the auspices of this provision are considered to be self-insuring and shall pay to the Commissioner for the .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.