Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1423 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : EXTENDED BENEFITS PROGRAM

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1423)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1984 · leading case: Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2× “§ 1344(c), as applied to eligibility for extended benefits through 21 V.S.A. § 1423 (a) (2). The central question is therefore whether the claimant’s eligibility for regular unemployment benefits would have been affected by 21 V.”
Smith v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 407 A.2d 158 (Vt. 1979). “§ 1423, which imposes only two requirements, as follows: An individual shall be eligible to receive extended benefits with respect to any week of unemployment in his eligibility period only if the commissioner finds that with respect to such week: (1) he is an “exhaustee” as…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1423(a) — 1 case
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). “§ 1344(c), as applied to eligibility for extended benefits through 21 V.S.A. § 1423 (a) (2). The central question is therefore whether the claimant’s eligibility for regular unemployment benefits would have been affected by 21 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.