Questions arising under the provisions of this chapter, if not settled by agreement
of the interested parties with the approval of the Commissioner, shall be determined,
except as otherwise provided, by the Commissioner. (Amended 2023, No. 85 (Adj. Sess.), § 122, eff. July 1, 2024.)
Smith v. Desautels, 2008 VT 17 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2דIn making his jurisdictional argument, plaintiff relies primarily on 21 V.S.A. § 606, which provides that "[q]uestions arising under the provisions of this chapter, if not settled by agreement .”
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Wallis, 2003 VT 103 (Vt. 2003). · cites it 2דThe Legislature has entrusted the administration of the workers’ compensation laws to the Commissioner, see 21 V.S.A § 606, and the Commissioner necessarily has developed expertise in this administration.”
The Travelers Ins. Co. v. Susan J. Carpenter, 411 F.3d 323 (2d Cir. 2005). “Carpenter argued below that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because Travelers was required to but did not exhaust administrative remedies under Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 606 (2003), which provides that “[q]uestions arising under the provisions of this…”
Merriam v. AIG Claims Servs., Inc., 2008 VT 8 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2ד” See 21 V.S.A. § 606 (issues arising under the Workers’ Compensation Act, “if not settled by agreement of the parties .”
Demag v. Am. Ins. Companies, 508 A.2d 697 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 2דThe Act itself contains the procedures for enforcement of those rights and remedies. When agreement is not reached by the interested parties, questions “shall be determined, except as otherwise provided, by the commissioner.”
Wentworth v. Crawford & Co., 807 A.2d 351 (Vt. 2002). “Rule 32 also furthered the Legislature’s directive that the Commissioner of the Department of Labor and Industry be the primary authority for determining questions arising under the Workers’ Compensation Act.”
Letourneau v. A.N. Deringer/Wausau Ins., 2008 VT 106 (Vt. 2008). “See 21 V.S.A. § 606 (granting Commissioner authority to determine questions arising under Vermont’s workers’ compensation laws); DeGray v.”
Buote v. Verizon New England, 249 F. Supp. 2d 422 (D. Vt. 2003). “2d 351, 354-55 (2002) (plaintiff required to exhaust vocational rehabilitation administrative remedies prior to bringing negligence action against vocational rehabilitation services provider) 6 ; see also Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 606 (Lexis 1987) (except as otherwise provided,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.