Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 645 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 645)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1982–2006 · leading case: Wolfe v. Yudichak, 571 A.2d 592 (Vt. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wolfe v. Yudichak, 571 A.2d 592 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 2× “The statute provides that the average weekly wage of a volunteer fireman injured in his duties as a fireman "shall be his average weekly wage in his regular employment.”
Bishop v. Town of Barre, 442 A.2d 50 (Vt. 1982). “See 21 V.S.A. § 645. Therefore, benefits for back impairments are calculated on the basis of the percentage of disability caused to the “whole man.”
Sanz v. Douglas Collins Constr., 2006 VT 102 (Vt. 2006). “On August 20, 2004, employer agreed to permanent total disability benefits, entitling claimant to at least 330 weeks of benefits, 21 V.S.A. § 645(a), but would not agree to pay those benefits in a lump sum as claimant requested.”
Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Constr. Co., 533 A.2d 1197 (Vt. 1987). “122, § 1) (defines limit of compensation as 330 weeks); 21 V.S.A. § 645 (as amended by 1967, No. 122, § 7) (the total amount payable in compensation on account of an accident to one person resulting in permanent total disability shall not exceed the limit of compensation); 21 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 645(a) — 1 case
Sanz v. Douglas Collins Constr., 2006 VT 102 (Vt. 2006). “On August 20, 2004, employer agreed to permanent total disability benefits, entitling claimant to at least 330 weeks of benefits, 21 V.S.A. § 645(a), but would not agree to pay those benefits in a lump sum as claimant requested.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.