(a) The holder of an operator’s license or privilege card issued under the provisions
of this subchapter may renew the operator’s license or privilege card at any time
prior to the expiration of the operator’s license or privilege card. If one or more
years remain before the expiration of the operator’s license or privilege card, the
Commissioner shall reduce the cost of the renewed operator’s license or privilege
card by an amount that is proportionate to the number of years rounded down to the
next whole year remaining before the expiration of the operator’s license or privilege
card.
(b) All application and documentation requirements for the renewal of an operator’s license
or privilege card shall apply to the early renewal of an operator’s license or privilege
card. (Added 2025, No. 66, § 16, eff. June 12, 2025.)
Aiken v. Malloy, 315 A.2d 488 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 7דIf a poll tax becomes delinquent, the collector may, among other remedies, seek to have the delinquent taxpayer’s operator’s license suspended by the defendant as provided in 23 V.S.A. § 604, which reads: . . . The collector of taxes of any municipality, school district or fire…”
Bieling v. Malloy, 346 A.2d 204 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 3ד5 (a), as follows: Whether 23 V.S.A. § 604, which empowers the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to suspend the motor vehicle operators licenses of the plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenors for nonpayment of poll taxes, 1.”
Wells v. Malloy, 402 F. Supp. 856 (D. Vt. 1975). “Malloy, supra, the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont upheld the constitutionality of 23 V.S.A. § 604 which empowers the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles to suspend the motor vehicle operator’s license of those individuals who fail to pay their poll taxes.”
Bessette v. Malloy, 325 F. Supp. 506 (D. Vt. 1971). “1 Plaintiffs seek a declaration that 23 V.S.A. § 604 is unconstitutional as violative of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and they request preliminary and permanent injunctions against the implementation of § 604 by defendant.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.