Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 117
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4415 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 007 : BYLAWS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4415)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1973–2013 · leading case: Wright v. Preseault, 306 A.2d 673 (Vt. 1973).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wright v. Preseault, 306 A.2d 673 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 2× “” In 24 V.S.A. § 4415(2), the planning commission may require as a condition to the approval of any plat that the plots shown on said plat will at least comply with the zoning regulations.”
Univ. Mall, LLC & 205 DS, LLC v. City of S. Burlington (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 3× “However, in Count I, Plaintiff challenges the enactment of the Interim Bylaw not on constitutional grounds, but rather on statutory grounds, for an alleged failure to follow enactment procedures outlined in 24 V.”
Univ. Mall, LLC v. City of So. Burlington (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “1 Rather, Petitioners’ claims here are stated in the nature of an original declaratory judgment action that challenges whether the City Council of the City of South Burlington implemented interim zoning regulations in conformance with 24 V.S.A. § 4415(a) (Count I); whether some…”
McDermott Site Plan Review (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “24 V.S.A. § 4415(a), (f). 3 Under the 2005 Interim Zoning Regulations, the density requirement for the Route 100 zoning district was reduced to a maximum of two multi-family dwelling units per acre.”
Gen. Land Co. CU Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “Under the state statute (prior to the 2004 amendments, which first referred to the municipal bodies as “appropriate municipal panels”), in a town without a DRB, it was only the planning commission that had statutory authority to rule on applications for subdivision (in a town…”
Gilmore Road, LLC CU Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “Under the state statute (prior to the 2004 amendments, which first referred to the municipal bodies as “appropriate municipal panels”), in a town without a DRB, it was only the planning commission that had statutory authority to rule on applications for subdivision (in a town…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4415(2) — 1 case
Wright v. Preseault, 306 A.2d 673 (Vt. 1973). “” In 24 V.S.A. § 4415(2), the planning commission may require as a condition to the approval of any plat that the plots shown on said plat will at least comply with the zoning regulations.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4415(a) — 3 cases
Univ. Mall, LLC v. City of So. Burlington (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “1 Rather, Petitioners’ claims here are stated in the nature of an original declaratory judgment action that challenges whether the City Council of the City of South Burlington implemented interim zoning regulations in conformance with 24 V.S.A. § 4415(a) (Count I); whether some…”
Univ. Mall, LLC & 205 DS, LLC v. City of S. Burlington (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “However, in Count I, Plaintiff challenges the enactment of the Interim Bylaw not on constitutional grounds, but rather on statutory grounds, for an alleged failure to follow enactment procedures outlined in 24 V.”
McDermott Site Plan Review (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “24 V.S.A. § 4415(a), (f). 3 Under the 2005 Interim Zoning Regulations, the density requirement for the Route 100 zoning district was reduced to a maximum of two multi-family dwelling units per acre.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4415(e) — 1 case
Univ. Mall, LLC & 205 DS, LLC v. City of S. Burlington (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “However, in Count I, Plaintiff challenges the enactment of the Interim Bylaw not on constitutional grounds, but rather on statutory grounds, for an alleged failure to follow enactment procedures outlined in 24 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.