Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 117
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 011 : APPEALS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4465)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 206 cases (34 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 4× “§ 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4465, who has participated as defined in 24 V.”
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 2× “" 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(3). Applicant does not dispute that neighbors are interested persons.”
In re Appeal of Tekram Partners, 2005 VT 92 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2× “24 V.S.A. § 4465 (formerly § 4464). This is the exclusive remedy for contesting local zon *631 ing decisions or actions.”
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc. Denial (Concerned4Newbury, Inc., & Town of Newbury, Cross-Appellant), 2023 VT 65 (Vt. 2023). · cites it 2× “The court concluded that DCF’s prospective long-term lease was a sufficient interest in the property to provide standing to appeal under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(5), and that the undisputed facts showed that the project was entitled to treatment as a residential use because it was a…”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 2× “§ 8504(b)(2)(A) or (C), the court did not address whether appellants qualified as “interested persons” as defined by 24 V.S.A. § 4465. Because we conclude that neither 10 V.”
In re Appeal of Carroll, 925 A.2d 990 (Vt. 2007). “Carroll did not participate in the hearing for final subdivision approval, she did not qualify as an interested party under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b), and dismissed Ms. Carroll’s appeal.”
In re Hopkins Certificate of Compliance (Bernard J. Boudreau, Appellant), 2020 VT 47 (Vt. 2020). “Although Boudreau acknowledges that he did not appeal from the final certificate, he argues that his appeal nonetheless evades the exclusivity-of-remedy provision because it is not a collateral attack on the final certificate, but instead a direct challenge to the MDRB’s…”
Town of Pawlet v. Daniel Banyai, 2022 VT 4 (Vt. 2022). “” An appeal pursuant to § 4465 is “the exclusive remedy of an interested person with respect to any decision or act taken [by a zoning administrator] .”
Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2009 VT 107 (Vt. 2009). “24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(2). ¶ 15. Moreover, a pledge of cooperation stands in stark contrast to so-called “contract zoning” cases on which homeowners rely, in which the zoning or permitting authority itself contracts with a developer to pre-approve all permits arising under a…”
In re Appeal of Carroll, 181 Vt. 383 (Vt. 2007). “Carroll did not participate in the hearing for final subdivision approval, she did not qualify as an interested party under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b), and dismissed Ms. Carroll's appeal.”
Sunset Cliff Homeowners Ass'n. v. City of Burlington, 2008 VT 56 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 3× “§ 4470(b) to issue the 2006 preliminary injunction because it was requested by the Association, a private party; and (3) because the Association failed to exhaust its administrative remedies under 24 V.S.A. §§ 4465 and 4472 before seeking the 2006 preliminary injunction in the…”
Jennifer Weinstein v. Jeanmarie Leonard & Carol Sayour v. Lloyd J. Weinstein & The Weinstein Grp., P.C., 2015 VT 75 (Vt. 2015). “24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(3). Interested persons have the right to appeal in municipal regulatory proceedings to the appropriate municipal panel, here the DRB, id.”
Show all 206 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(4) — 2 cases
Unified Buddhist church, Inc. Indirect Discharge Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Entergy Nuclear/Vermont Yankee Thermal Discharge Permit Amendment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(a) — 37 cases
In re Hopkins Certificate of Compliance (Bernard J. Boudreau, Appellant), 2020 VT 47 (Vt. 2020). “Although Boudreau acknowledges that he did not appeal from the final certificate, he argues that his appeal nonetheless evades the exclusivity-of-remedy provision because it is not a collateral attack on the final certificate, but instead a direct challenge to the MDRB’s…”
Town of Pawlet v. Daniel Banyai, 2022 VT 4 (Vt. 2022). “” An appeal pursuant to § 4465 is “the exclusive remedy of an interested person with respect to any decision or act taken [by a zoning administrator] .”
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
Vincent Permit 23-071 - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023).
Feeley Constr. Permits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(a)(1) — 1 case
Smith NOV Appeal (Interim Decision on Summary Judgment Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b) — 55 cases
In re Appeal of Carroll, 925 A.2d 990 (Vt. 2007). “Carroll did not participate in the hearing for final subdivision approval, she did not qualify as an interested party under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b), and dismissed Ms. Carroll’s appeal.”
In re Appeal of Carroll, 181 Vt. 383 (Vt. 2007). “Carroll did not participate in the hearing for final subdivision approval, she did not qualify as an interested party under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b), and dismissed Ms. Carroll's appeal.”
Sunset Cliff Homeowners Ass'n. v. City of Burlington, 2008 VT 56 (Vt. 2008). “§ 4470(b) to issue the 2006 preliminary injunction because it was requested by the Association, a private party; and (3) because the Association failed to exhaust its administrative remedies under 24 V.S.A. §§ 4465 and 4472 before seeking the 2006 preliminary injunction in the…”
Burns 12 Weston Street NOV - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b)(1) — 11 cases
Zlotoff Found. Inc. NOV (2) - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
RACDC Retention Pond (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Castleton Expansion & Renovation (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Schuyler NOV (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
53 North Pleasant Street Denial - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b)(2) — 12 cases
Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2009 VT 107 (Vt. 2009). “24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(2). ¶ 15. Moreover, a pledge of cooperation stands in stark contrast to so-called “contract zoning” cases on which homeowners rely, in which the zoning or permitting authority itself contracts with a developer to pre-approve all permits arising under a…”
In re Appeal of Tekram Partners, 2005 VT 92 (Vt. 2005). “24 V.S.A. § 4465 (formerly § 4464). This is the exclusive remedy for contesting local zon *631 ing decisions or actions.”
Main St Place LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b)(2)(C) — 1 case
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b)(3) — 94 cases
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). “§ 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4465, who has participated as defined in 24 V.”
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “" 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(3). Applicant does not dispute that neighbors are interested persons.”
Jennifer Weinstein v. Jeanmarie Leonard & Carol Sayour v. Lloyd J. Weinstein & The Weinstein Grp., P.C., 2015 VT 75 (Vt. 2015). “24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(3). Interested persons have the right to appeal in municipal regulatory proceedings to the appropriate municipal panel, here the DRB, id.”
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
Fowler NOV (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b)(4) — 38 cases
Fowler NOV (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Poultney Props. LLC Change of Use & SP App. - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Hitchcock 2-Lot Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Burton Corp. Site Work Approval - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Brandan Plaza CU Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4465(b)(5) — 1 case
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc. Denial (Concerned4Newbury, Inc., & Town of Newbury, Cross-Appellant), 2023 VT 65 (Vt. 2023). “The court concluded that DCF’s prospective long-term lease was a sufficient interest in the property to provide standing to appeal under 24 V.S.A. § 4465(b)(5), and that the undisputed facts showed that the project was entitled to treatment as a residential use because it was a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.