Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 117
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4471 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 011 : APPEALS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4471)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 260 cases (30 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 10× “The statutes pertaining to municipal planning and development limit the filing of appeals to the Environmental Court from municipal proceedings to interested persons [2] "who [have] participated as defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4471 in the municipal regulatory proceeding.”
In Re Appeal of Albert, 2008 VT 30 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 6× “See 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a) ("An interested person may appeal a decision of a board of adjustment, a planning commission, or a development review board to the environmental court.”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 3× “Due to her participation in the hearing below, the court concluded that she was an interested person, 24 V.S.A. § 4471, but that the appeal was untimely filed.”
In Re Appeals of Garen, 807 A.2d 448 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “After the time for appeal had tolled, Katherine Gluck and John Desautels sought permission to intervene in the appeal pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a), V.R.C.P. 24(a)(1) and 76(a).”
In Re Appeal of Gulli, 816 A.2d 485 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “See 24 V.S.A. §4471 (allowing appeals from development review board to environmental court).”
In re Appeal of Carroll, 925 A.2d 990 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 4× “§ 4471(a) does not apply because it did not come into effect until July 2004 and cannot apply to a subdivision request filed in 2003; (2) she met the participation requirement at the December 2004 final plat hearing; and (3) she met the participation requirement at the October…”
In Re Maple Tree Place, 594 A.2d 404 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 3× “MTP appealed to the Chittenden Superior Court under 24 V.S.A. §§ 4471 and 4475, referencing in addition V.”
In re Appeal of Carroll, 181 Vt. 383 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 4× “§ 4471(a) does not apply because it did not come into effect until July 2004 and cannot apply to a subdivision request filed in 2003; (2) she met the participation requirement at the December 2004 final plat hearing; and (3) she met the participation requirement at the October…”
In Re Dunnett, 776 A.2d 406 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tofferi argues that two 1995 resolutions by the village board of trustees creating the development review board and establishing that the board be governed by the Municipal Administrative Procedure Act entitle the board to on-the-record review by the environmental court pursuant…”
Kalakowski v. John A. Russell Corp., 401 A.2d 906 (Vt. 1979). · cites it 2× “24 V.S.A. § 4471. They also brought a separate action to enjoin construction of the building.”
In Re Appeal of 232511 Investments, Ltd., 2006 VT 27 (Vt. 2006). “As a preliminary matter, Stowe Highlands contends that the Town does not have standing in this appeal.”
Rhoades Salvage/ABC Metals v. Town of Milton Selectboard, 2010 VT 82 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 2× “24 V.S.A. § 4471; V.R.E.C.P. 5(g). No one was sworn in.”
Show all 260 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4471(a) — 99 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The statutes pertaining to municipal planning and development limit the filing of appeals to the Environmental Court from municipal proceedings to interested persons [2] "who [have] participated as defined in 24 V.S.A. § 4471 in the municipal regulatory proceeding.”
In Re Appeal of Albert, 2008 VT 30 (Vt. 2008). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a) ("An interested person may appeal a decision of a board of adjustment, a planning commission, or a development review board to the environmental court.”
In Re Appeals of Garen, 807 A.2d 448 (Vt. 2002). “After the time for appeal had tolled, Katherine Gluck and John Desautels sought permission to intervene in the appeal pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4471(a), V.R.C.P. 24(a)(1) and 76(a).”
In re Appeal of Carroll, 925 A.2d 990 (Vt. 2007). “§ 4471(a) does not apply because it did not come into effect until July 2004 and cannot apply to a subdivision request filed in 2003; (2) she met the participation requirement at the December 2004 final plat hearing; and (3) she met the participation requirement at the October…”
In Re Dunnett, 776 A.2d 406 (Vt. 2001). “Tofferi argues that two 1995 resolutions by the village board of trustees creating the development review board and establishing that the board be governed by the Municipal Administrative Procedure Act entitle the board to on-the-record review by the environmental court pursuant…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4471(b) — 42 cases
In re Ferrera & Fenn Gravel Pit, 87 A.3d 483 (Vt. 2013).
In re Ferrera & Fenn Gravel Pit, 195 Vt. 138 (Vt. 2013).
Sprague Farms, LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Miller Conditional Use Application (After Remand) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
VTRE Inv. LLC CU Duplex - Decision on the Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4471(c) — 6 cases
Poultney Props. LLC Change of Use & SP App. - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Hitchcock 2-Lot Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Rockingham Sch. Dist. Permit Revocation (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Smith Bldg. Permit (Garage) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Gaujac Final Site Plan PUD Review (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.