Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 5005 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 5005)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (Vt. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (Vt. 2011). “Landlord relies on 24 V.S.A. § 5005(e)(4), which provides that “[i]n order to hear an appeal, a majority of the board must be present.”
Pollak v. City of Burlington, 608 A.2d 659 (Vt. 1992). “24 V.S.A. § 5005. As part of its minimum housing program, the city has a security deposit provision.”
Eliason v. Harrison (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “]” 24 V.S.A. § 5005(c)(1). A person aggrieved by a board decision may appeal it to the superior court.”
South River v. Burlington Hous. Bd. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “South River contends that the Board “appears to attempt to foreclose [South River’s] rights to bring a claim for damages – including any that would have been covered by the $2500 security deposit or that are above that sum – in civil or small claims court.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 5005(c) — 1 case
South River v. Burlington Hous. Bd. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “South River contends that the Board “appears to attempt to foreclose [South River’s] rights to bring a claim for damages – including any that would have been covered by the $2500 security deposit or that are above that sum – in civil or small claims court.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 5005(c)(1) — 1 case
Eliason v. Harrison (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “]” 24 V.S.A. § 5005(c)(1). A person aggrieved by a board decision may appeal it to the superior court.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 5005(e)(4) — 1 case
In Re Soon Kwon, 2011 VT 26 (Vt. 2011). “Landlord relies on 24 V.S.A. § 5005(e)(4), which provides that “[i]n order to hear an appeal, a majority of the board must be present.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.