Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 102)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 37 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: Rheaume v. Pallito, 2011 VT 72 (Vt. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rheaume v. Pallito, 2011 VT 72 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “The establishment of programming requirements falls within the Commissioner’s explicit power to establish inmate treatment programs under 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(2). The DOC is not an inferior court or tribunal of the superior court; nor is it performing the functions of a…”
State v. Bohannon, 2010 VT 22 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 4× “Yet, 28 V.S.A. § 102 charges the DOC Commissioner with a series of powers that includes the "assignment and transfer of persons committed to the custody of the commissioner to correctional facilities.”
Parker v. Gorczyk, 744 A.2d 410 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 4× “" 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(2). More specifically, the Commissioner is charged with making rules and regulations for the governing of and treatment of inmates, see id.”
Kevin Holcomb v. Mark Lykens, Sean Smith, Joanne Pereria & John Gorczyk, 337 F.3d 217 (2d Cir. 2003). “Under the authority of 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(1), the Commissioner of the DOC may promulgate “rules” and “regulations” to discharge his or her responsibilities.”
Parker v. Gorczyk, 787 A.2d 494 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 3× “” 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(1). The APA establishes certain procedures that an agency must follow in issuing rules, including publication, notice and comment, hearings and legislative review.”
Borden v. Hofmann, 2009 VT 30 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2× “The majority, however, does not in any way defer to the Department or acknowledge the discretion that must necessarily inhere for the Department to be able to discharge its weighty responsibility; to the contrary, the majority chooses on appeal to disbelieve the testimony of the…”
Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. State, 2009 VT 21 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2× “28 V.S.A. § 102(c). ¶ 40. The Legislature's delegation to the Department and to the Commissioner of constant direction and control over security, order, safety, and discipline of facilities, staff, and inmates is not a topic for bargaining.”
State v. Powers, 789 A.2d 962 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 4× “The Department contends that the trial court erroneously concluded that, notwithstanding 28 V.S.A § 102(b)(12) (granting the Commissioner of Corrections the power to contract with private collection agencies for the collections of fines, penalties and restitution imposed under…”
Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F. Supp. 805 (D. Vt. 1975). · cites it 3× “See 28 V.S.A. § 102(c) (ll). 7 With the closing of the Windsor facility, their will be no long maximum security facility within the State of Vermont.”
LaFaso v. Patrissi, 633 A.2d 695 (Vt. 1993). “See 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(5) (commissioner is charged with responsibility “[t]o prescribe rules and regulations for the maintenance of discipline and control at each correctional facility”).”
Inman v. Pallito, 195 Vt. 218 (Vt. 2013). “28 V.S.A. § 102(c )( 1), (c)(8). The use of the term “termination” here is merely a label.”
State v. Lewis, 711 A.2d 669 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2× “” 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(10). Hence, defendant’s extradition was more closely related to his earlier conviction and *536 sentence for assault, robbery, and kidnapping than to his subsequent prosecution for escape.”
Show all 37 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(5) — 1 case
Godin v. Corr. Corp. of Am. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(a) — 2 cases
Godin v. Corr. Corp. of Am. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Nichols v. LaPlante (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b) — 2 cases
Town of Stowe v. Cnty. of Lamoille, 362 A.2d 159 (Vt. 1976).
Breer v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b)(1) — 2 cases
Breer v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
George Woods v. Tina Heywood (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b)(10) — 2 cases
State v. Bohannon, 2010 VT 22 (Vt. 2010). “Yet, 28 V.S.A. § 102 charges the DOC Commissioner with a series of powers that includes the "assignment and transfer of persons committed to the custody of the commissioner to correctional facilities.”
State v. Lewis, 711 A.2d 669 (Vt. 1998). “” 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(10). Hence, defendant’s extradition was more closely related to his earlier conviction and *536 sentence for assault, robbery, and kidnapping than to his subsequent prosecution for escape.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b)(12) — 1 case
State v. Powers, 789 A.2d 962 (Vt. 2001). “The Department contends that the trial court erroneously concluded that, notwithstanding 28 V.S.A § 102(b)(12) (granting the Commissioner of Corrections the power to contract with private collection agencies for the collections of fines, penalties and restitution imposed under…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b)(2) — 12 cases
Rheaume v. Pallito, 2011 VT 72 (Vt. 2011). “The establishment of programming requirements falls within the Commissioner’s explicit power to establish inmate treatment programs under 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(2). The DOC is not an inferior court or tribunal of the superior court; nor is it performing the functions of a…”
Parker v. Gorczyk, 744 A.2d 410 (Vt. 1999). “" 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(2). More specifically, the Commissioner is charged with making rules and regulations for the governing of and treatment of inmates, see id.”
Zachary Rose v. Michael Touchette, Comm'r, Dep't of Corr., 2021 VT 77 (Vt. 2021).
Kirk WOOL v. Andrew PALLITO, Comm'r Bernard Carter v. Lisa Menard, Comm'r, 193 A.3d 510 (Vt. 2018).
Jermaine Holder v. Andrew Pallito (Vt. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b)(4) — 1 case
State v. Powers, 789 A.2d 962 (Vt. 2001). “The Department contends that the trial court erroneously concluded that, notwithstanding 28 V.S.A § 102(b)(12) (granting the Commissioner of Corrections the power to contract with private collection agencies for the collections of fines, penalties and restitution imposed under…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(b)(5) — 3 cases
Bain v. Hofmann, 2010 VT 18 (Vt. 2010).
Wetmore v. Smith, 298 A.2d 567 (Vt. 1972).
Gundlah v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(c) — 3 cases
Vermont State Employees' Ass'n v. State, 2009 VT 21 (Vt. 2009). “28 V.S.A. § 102(c). ¶ 40. The Legislature's delegation to the Department and to the Commissioner of constant direction and control over security, order, safety, and discipline of facilities, staff, and inmates is not a topic for bargaining.”
Rebideau v. Stoneman, 398 F. Supp. 805 (D. Vt. 1975). “See 28 V.S.A. § 102(c) (ll). 7 With the closing of the Windsor facility, their will be no long maximum security facility within the State of Vermont.”
Nash v. Coxon, 583 A.2d 96 (Vt. 1990).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(c)(1) — 5 cases
Kevin Holcomb v. Mark Lykens, Sean Smith, Joanne Pereria & John Gorczyk, 337 F.3d 217 (2d Cir. 2003). “Under the authority of 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(1), the Commissioner of the DOC may promulgate “rules” and “regulations” to discharge his or her responsibilities.”
Parker v. Gorczyk, 787 A.2d 494 (Vt. 2001). “” 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(1). The APA establishes certain procedures that an agency must follow in issuing rules, including publication, notice and comment, hearings and legislative review.”
Inman v. Pallito, 87 A.3d 449 (Vt. 2013).
Kirk WOOL v. Andrew PALLITO, Comm'r Bernard Carter v. Lisa Menard, Comm'r, 193 A.3d 510 (Vt. 2018).
Taylor v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(c)(3) — 1 case
Parker v. Gorczyk, 744 A.2d 410 (Vt. 1999). “" 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(2). More specifically, the Commissioner is charged with making rules and regulations for the governing of and treatment of inmates, see id.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(c)(5) — 2 cases
LaFaso v. Patrissi, 633 A.2d 695 (Vt. 1993). “See 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(5) (commissioner is charged with responsibility “[t]o prescribe rules and regulations for the maintenance of discipline and control at each correctional facility”).”
Nichols v. LaPlante (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(c)(6) — 3 cases
Borden v. Hofmann, 2009 VT 30 (Vt. 2009). “The majority, however, does not in any way defer to the Department or acknowledge the discretion that must necessarily inhere for the Department to be able to discharge its weighty responsibility; to the contrary, the majority chooses on appeal to disbelieve the testimony of the…”
State v. Berard, 576 A.2d 118 (Vt. 1990).
Daye v. State, 769 A.2d 630 (2000).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(c)(8) — 4 cases
Rheaume v. Pallito, 2011 VT 72 (Vt. 2011). “The establishment of programming requirements falls within the Commissioner’s explicit power to establish inmate treatment programs under 28 V.S.A. § 102(b)(2). The DOC is not an inferior court or tribunal of the superior court; nor is it performing the functions of a…”
Mark Macha v. Andrew Pallito, Comm'r (Vt. 2015).
David Holcomb v. Andrew Pallito (Vt. 2012).
Amon Sylvester v. Andrew Pallito, Comm., Dept. of Corr. (Vt. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 102(e)(1) — 1 case
Parker v. Gorczyk, 787 A.2d 494 (Vt. 2001). “” 28 V.S.A. § 102(c)(1). The APA establishes certain procedures that an agency must follow in issuing rules, including publication, notice and comment, hearings and legislative review.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.