§ 701. Commitment to the custody of the Commissioner
(a) When a person is convicted of an offense and the court commits him or her to a term
of imprisonment, the commitment shall be to the custody of the Commissioner.
(b) The Commissioner shall have the authority to designate the place of confinement where
the sentence shall be served.
(c) Whenever in this title or in any other law reference is made to the sentencing or
confinement of inmates to any correctional facility under authority of the Department,
such reference shall be construed to mean sentencing or confinement to the custody
of the Commissioner rather than to any particular facility of the Department.
(d) The sentence of imprisonment of any person convicted of an offense shall commence
to run from the date on which such person is received at a correctional facility.
If any such person shall be committed to a jail or other place of detention to await
transportation to the place in which his or her sentence is to be served, his or her
sentence shall commence to run from the date on which he or she is received at such
jail or other place of detention. (Added 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 20.)
Nichols, Wool v. Hofmann, 2010 VT 36 (Vt. 2010). “2d at 633-34 (concluding that state contract with county in New Jersey to transfer inmates was entered into pursuant to DOC Commissioner’s broad authorization “to designate the place of confinement where the sentence shall be served” under 28 V.S.A. § 701(b) and not pursuant to…”
State v. Martin, 2008 VT 53 (Vt. 2008). “: (1) every person convicted in a court in this state of a designated crime on or after the effective date of this subchapter; and (2) every person who was convicted in a court in this state of a designated crime prior to the effective date of this subchapter and, after the…”
King v. Hofmann, 2008 VT 18 (Vt. 2008). “Finally, plaintiffs appear to argue that 28 V.S.A. § 701(c), which provides that any reference to sentencing or confinement of inmates to any correctional facility under the Department’s authority shall be construed to mean sentencing or confinement to the custody of the…”
Daye v. State, 769 A.2d 630 (2000). “” 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). To this end, the Commissioner may also “order the assignment and transfer of persons committed to the custody of the commissioner.”
williams v. menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “§ 601(10) (before May 25, 2016), but includes 5 exceptions at 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). Exception 1 applies if inspection is required by state or federal law.”
Brandt v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “” 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). 2 ORDER For the foregoing reasons, Mr.”
Williams v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “§ 601(10) (before May 25, 2016), but includes 5 exceptions at 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). Exception 1 applies if inspection is required by state or federal law.”
Breer v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” 28 V.S.A. § 701(a), (b). The Legislature has further required the Department to “establish an offender reintegration process that requires offenders to be held accountable to their victims and the community,” under which an “offender who participates in the reintegration…”
State v. Martin (Vt. 2008). “: (1) every person convicted in a court in this state of a designated crime on or after the effective date of this subchapter; and (2) every person who was convicted in a court in this state of a designated crime prior to the effective date of this subchapter and, after the…”
Rebideau v. Moeykens, 312 A.2d 926 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 2דSee 28 V.S.A. § 701(a), (c), No. 199, § 20, of the Public Acts of 1971 (Adj.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 701(a) — 2 cases
Breer v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “” 28 V.S.A. § 701(a), (b). The Legislature has further required the Department to “establish an offender reintegration process that requires offenders to be held accountable to their victims and the community,” under which an “offender who participates in the reintegration…”
Rebideau v. Moeykens, 312 A.2d 926 (Vt. 1973). “See 28 V.S.A. § 701(a), (c), No. 199, § 20, of the Public Acts of 1971 (Adj.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 701(b) — 6 cases
Nichols, Wool v. Hofmann, 2010 VT 36 (Vt. 2010). “2d at 633-34 (concluding that state contract with county in New Jersey to transfer inmates was entered into pursuant to DOC Commissioner’s broad authorization “to designate the place of confinement where the sentence shall be served” under 28 V.S.A. § 701(b) and not pursuant to…”
Daye v. State, 769 A.2d 630 (2000). “” 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). To this end, the Commissioner may also “order the assignment and transfer of persons committed to the custody of the commissioner.”
williams v. menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “§ 601(10) (before May 25, 2016), but includes 5 exceptions at 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). Exception 1 applies if inspection is required by state or federal law.”
Brandt v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “” 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). 2 ORDER For the foregoing reasons, Mr.”
Williams v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “§ 601(10) (before May 25, 2016), but includes 5 exceptions at 28 V.S.A. § 701(b). Exception 1 applies if inspection is required by state or federal law.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 701(c) — 1 case
King v. Hofmann, 2008 VT 18 (Vt. 2008). “Finally, plaintiffs appear to argue that 28 V.S.A. § 701(c), which provides that any reference to sentencing or confinement of inmates to any correctional facility under the Department’s authority shall be construed to mean sentencing or confinement to the custody of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.