Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 28 Chapter 11
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001A : OFFENDER REINTEGRATION

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 724)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 38 cases (38 in the last 5 years), 2021–2026 · leading case: Anthony Davey v. James Baker, 2021 VT 94 (Vt. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anthony Davey v. James Baker, 2021 VT 94 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 3× “The State moved to dismiss the petition arguing that 28 V.S.A. § 724, the statute providing the terms and conditions of community-reentry furlough, governed petitioner’s appeal, that petitioner’s delayed hearing was not grounds for release under a petition for habeas corpus, and…”
Martin v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 6× “As noted in Superior Court decisions, “the statute plainly confers jurisdiction to hear appeals only from technical violations .”
George Woods, Jr. v. Dep't of Corr. (Vt. 2025). · cites it 6× “2 Petitioner timely appealed to the civil division under Rule 74 and 28 V.S.A. § 724(c). An attorney from the Prisoners’ Rights Office subsequently entered an appearance on his behalf.”
white v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 5× “As such, Petitioner contends that the absconding finding and evidence were beyond the Court’s scope of review under 28 V.S.A. § 724. Petitioner’s motion is denied because while the Court did discuss the issue of absconding in its decision, this decision was ancillary to the…”
Jones v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 5× “Appellant's primary argument is that the Department's decision effectively penalized him for his on-going struggles with alcohol in derogation of 18 V.”
Myers v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 5× “” 28 V.S.A. § 724(c)(1). “The appeal shall be based on a de novo review of the record.”
Buck v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 5× “" 28 V.S.A. § 724. Given the court's caseload and limited hearing time available generally and in Orleans County specifically, the court declined to schedule a second hearing to give the Department an opportunity to respond to appellant's late-filed exhibits.”
boudro v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). · cites it 4× “Petitioner seeks judicial review of this determination under 28 V.S.A. § 724. At the merits hearing held on September 27, 2023, there was considerable confusion about the basis for the agency’s terse decision, including whether the finding of threatening behavior was based upon…”
dezotell v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 4× “As such, the Department contends, it falls outside of the narrow authority of 28 V.S.A. § 724, which only give the Court authority to review a case staffing that result from a furlough revocation decision.”
hough v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 4× “Therefore, the Court determines that Petitioner actions constituted absconding as that term is defined under 28 V.S.A. § 724(a), and the Department had sufficient factual justification for making that determination.”
Collins v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 4× “Collins pleaded guilty to a violation of Condition 1 and Special Condition 16 of his furlough conditions, his violation was not a “technical violation,” and so not reviewable under 28 V.S.A. § 724. The court denies the motion.”
Woods v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 4× “The present appeal is governed by 28 V.S.A. § 724 and V.R.C.P. 74. For the reasons outlined below, Appellant Woods' appeal is Denied.”
Show all 38 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(a) — 1 case
hough v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Therefore, the Court determines that Petitioner actions constituted absconding as that term is defined under 28 V.S.A. § 724(a), and the Department had sufficient factual justification for making that determination.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(b) — 1 case
Levi Davis v. Dep't of Corr. (Vt. 2023).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(c) — 10 cases
Anthony Davey v. James Baker, 2021 VT 94 (Vt. 2021). “The State moved to dismiss the petition arguing that 28 V.S.A. § 724, the statute providing the terms and conditions of community-reentry furlough, governed petitioner’s appeal, that petitioner’s delayed hearing was not grounds for release under a petition for habeas corpus, and…”
dezotell v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “As such, the Department contends, it falls outside of the narrow authority of 28 V.S.A. § 724, which only give the Court authority to review a case staffing that result from a furlough revocation decision.”
white v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “As such, Petitioner contends that the absconding finding and evidence were beyond the Court’s scope of review under 28 V.S.A. § 724. Petitioner’s motion is denied because while the Court did discuss the issue of absconding in its decision, this decision was ancillary to the…”
Collins v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Collins pleaded guilty to a violation of Condition 1 and Special Condition 16 of his furlough conditions, his violation was not a “technical violation,” and so not reviewable under 28 V.S.A. § 724. The court denies the motion.”
Woods v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(c)(1) — 26 cases
boudro v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “Petitioner seeks judicial review of this determination under 28 V.S.A. § 724. At the merits hearing held on September 27, 2023, there was considerable confusion about the basis for the agency’s terse decision, including whether the finding of threatening behavior was based upon…”
George Woods, Jr. v. Dep't of Corr. (Vt. 2025). “2 Petitioner timely appealed to the civil division under Rule 74 and 28 V.S.A. § 724(c). An attorney from the Prisoners’ Rights Office subsequently entered an appearance on his behalf.”
Myers v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “” 28 V.S.A. § 724(c)(1). “The appeal shall be based on a de novo review of the record.”
Martin v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “As noted in Superior Court decisions, “the statute plainly confers jurisdiction to hear appeals only from technical violations .”
Jones v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(c)(2) — 3 cases
hough v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Therefore, the Court determines that Petitioner actions constituted absconding as that term is defined under 28 V.S.A. § 724(a), and the Department had sufficient factual justification for making that determination.”
Martin v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “As noted in Superior Court decisions, “the statute plainly confers jurisdiction to hear appeals only from technical violations .”
George Woods, Jr. v. Dep't of Corr. (Vt. 2025). “2 Petitioner timely appealed to the civil division under Rule 74 and 28 V.S.A. § 724(c). An attorney from the Prisoners’ Rights Office subsequently entered an appearance on his behalf.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(c)(3) — 4 cases
Dezotell v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Parker v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Lethbridge v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Buck v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “" 28 V.S.A. § 724. Given the court's caseload and limited hearing time available generally and in Orleans County specifically, the court declined to schedule a second hearing to give the Department an opportunity to respond to appellant's late-filed exhibits.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(c)(d)(1) — 1 case
Myers v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “” 28 V.S.A. § 724(c)(1). “The appeal shall be based on a de novo review of the record.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(c)(d)(2) — 1 case
Myers v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “” 28 V.S.A. § 724(c)(1). “The appeal shall be based on a de novo review of the record.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d) — 9 cases
Dezotell v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Collins v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Collins pleaded guilty to a violation of Condition 1 and Special Condition 16 of his furlough conditions, his violation was not a “technical violation,” and so not reviewable under 28 V.S.A. § 724. The court denies the motion.”
Reason v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Martin v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “As noted in Superior Court decisions, “the statute plainly confers jurisdiction to hear appeals only from technical violations .”
MacAllister v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(1) — 3 cases
Foster v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
George Woods, Jr. v. Dep't of Corr. (Vt. 2025). “2 Petitioner timely appealed to the civil division under Rule 74 and 28 V.S.A. § 724(c). An attorney from the Prisoners’ Rights Office subsequently entered an appearance on his behalf.”
Jones v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(2) — 3 cases
benoit v. doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Woods v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “The present appeal is governed by 28 V.S.A. § 724 and V.R.C.P. 74. For the reasons outlined below, Appellant Woods' appeal is Denied.”
Jones v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Appellant's primary argument is that the Department's decision effectively penalized him for his on-going struggles with alcohol in derogation of 18 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(2)(A) — 1 case
Jones v. Deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Appellant's primary argument is that the Department's decision effectively penalized him for his on-going struggles with alcohol in derogation of 18 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(2)(B) — 1 case
White v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(2)(C) — 1 case
Runnels v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(3) — 1 case
hough v. deml (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Therefore, the Court determines that Petitioner actions constituted absconding as that term is defined under 28 V.S.A. § 724(a), and the Department had sufficient factual justification for making that determination.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 724(d)(A) — 1 case
Mattson v. Doc (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.