§ 725. Parole hearing for offenders on community supervision furlough
The Department shall submit to the Parole Board a recommendation relative to whether
the offender should be released to parole pursuant to section 501 of this title when:
(1) an offender sentenced solely for the commission of one or more unlisted crimes has,
in the sole discretion of the Department, successfully completed 90 days of community
supervision furlough; or
(2) an offender sentenced for the commission of at least one or more listed crimes has,
in the sole discretion of the Department, successfully completed 180 days of community
supervision furlough. (Added 2001, No. 61, § 89, eff. June 16, 2001; amended 2019, No. 148 (Adj. Sess.), § 13, eff. Jan. 1, 2021.)
Kirk WOOL v. Andrew PALLITO, Comm'r Bernard Carter v. Lisa Menard, Comm'r, 193 A.3d 510 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2דIf an offender convicted of a listed crime satisfactorily completed 180 days in the conditional reentry program, the Department could recommend to the Parole Board that the offender be released on parole.”
Girouard v. Hofmann, 2009 VT 66 (Vt. 2009). “Plaintiff asserts that a favorable recommendation from DOC is required for his parole application to have any chance of success, and that he is unable to receive this recommendation without first successfully completing a minimum number of furlough days, citing 28 V.S.A. §…”
Chandler v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 2ד28 V.S.A. § 725. For inmates convicted of listed offenses, such as Mr.”
Carter v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “I, § 10, by substantially prolonging his effective ineligibility for parole. He seeks an injunction requiring the DOC to schedule his programming in the manner it presumably would have prior to the adoption of these statutes and directives.”
In re Ladd (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “28 V.S.A. § 725. As petitioner notes, this challenge does not go to his liberty interest and is, therefore, not eligible for judicial review of due process.”
Girouard v. Hofmann, 2009 VT 66 (Vt. 2009). “Plaintiff asserts that a favorable recommendation from DOC is required for his parole application to have any chance of success, and that he is unable to receive this recommendation without first successfully completing a minimum number of furlough days, citing 28 V.S.A. §…”
Chandler v. Pallito (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “28 V.S.A. § 725. For inmates convicted of listed offenses, such as Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.