§ 759. Employment and furlough of an inmate during the pendency of prosecution
(a) A person confined at a correctional facility during the pendency of a prosecution
against him or her may request to be employed pursuant to the provisions of section 751 of this title. Upon receipt of the request, the supervising officer may so employ the inmate,
subject to all the rules and regulations of section 751.
(b) A person so confined may be allowed access to the work release and furlough programs
pursuant to the provisions of sections 753 and 808 of this title with the consent of the prosecuting State’s Attorney and the judge of the court in
which the person is being prosecuted. (Added 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 20.)
State v. Blondin, 665 A.2d 587 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 2דSee 28 V.S.A. § 759(b). He does not argue that he sought, or was denied, such permission, or that he would have received such privileges had he made bail on the new charges.”
In Re Lampman, 373 A.2d 547 (Vt. 1977). “Under 28 V.S.A. § 759(b), a person confined pending prosecution has access to work release and furlough programs only if the *228 prosecuting officer and trial judge give consent.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 759(b) — 2 cases
State v. Blondin, 665 A.2d 587 (Vt. 1995). “See 28 V.S.A. § 759(b). He does not argue that he sought, or was denied, such permission, or that he would have received such privileges had he made bail on the new charges.”
In Re Lampman, 373 A.2d 547 (Vt. 1977). “Under 28 V.S.A. § 759(b), a person confined pending prosecution has access to work release and furlough programs only if the *228 prosecuting officer and trial judge give consent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.