A reduction of up to 30 days in the minimum and maximum terms of confinement may be
made in accordance with a policy established by the director of a work camp in which
an inmate is confined for each month during which the inmate demonstrates, beyond
the level normally expected, consistent program performance or meritorious work performance. (Added 2005, No. 63, § 4.)
State v. Kimmick, 2007 VT 45 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 7דDefendant's third argument is that the district court's sentence is illegal because reducing the maximum sentence through good-time credits under 28 V.S.A. § 811 [*] makes the effective maximum and minimum sentences the same, in violation of 13 V.”
State v. Martin, 2009 VT 15 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 5דWe begin by briefly recounting the pertinent history of 28 V.S.A. § 811, which governed good-time credits until its repeal in 2005, and which applies to this case.”
Trivento v. Comm'r of Corr., 380 A.2d 69 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 4ד) may accumulate “good time credit” (under 28 V.S.A. § 811, superseding 28 V.S.A. § 252), to be applied against a subsequently imposed sentence.”
In Re Grega, 2003 VT 77 (Vt. 2003). “§ 2311(c) unconstitutional because it violates his due process right to a vested earned reduction in term off his sentence pursuant to 28 V.S.A. § 811. Petitioner claims that a sentence of life without the possibility of parole directly conflicts with Vermont’s reduction of term…”
State v. Delaoz, 2010 VT 65 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2דThe State points to the several forms of supervised release now authorized by statute and suggests that the rehabilitative tools available to the Department of Corrections now include more than just parole.”
Conway v. Gorczyk, 765 A.2d 463 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 3דSee 28 V.S.A. § 811(b). 1 Petitioner Charles Conway was terminated from participation in the DOC’s Cognitive Self Change program.”
LaFaso v. Patrissi, 633 A.2d 695 (Vt. 1993). “28 V.S.A. § 811(b). Any order of retroactive class relief for this violation must surmount DOC’s lack of record keeping and show what meritorious good time the inmate would otherwise have received.”
State v. Stanley, 933 A.2d 184 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 2ד), § 1 (former 28 V.S.A. § 811(g) (repealed by 2005, No.”
In Re Perry, 400 A.2d 1013 (Vt. 1979). “The basic formula for computation of an inmate’s conditional release date is relatively simple.”
Ladd v. Gorczyk, 2004 VT 87 (Vt. 2004). “Ladd contends the Department has erroneously applied the current statutory provision governing earned reduction of term, 28 V.S.A. § 811(a) & (b), which became effective July 1, 2000 and provides for a reduction of time for good behavior only from the maximum term of…”
Venman v. Patrissi, 590 A.2d 897 (Vt. 1991). “Plaintiff appeals from a declaratory ruling by the superior court that upheld the Department of Corrections’ application of the good-time credit statute, 28 V.S.A. § 811. The statute allows reduction of an inmate’s sentence by up to ten days for every month served with no…”
State v. Kimmick, 2007 VT 45 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 7דDefendant’s third argument is that the district court’s sentence is illegal because reducing the maximum sentence through good-time credits under 28 V.S.A. § 811 * makes the effective maxi *637 mum and minimum sentences the same, in violation of 13 V.”
State v. Kimmick, 2007 VT 45 (Vt. 2007). “Defendant's third argument is that the district court's sentence is illegal because reducing the maximum sentence through good-time credits under 28 V.S.A. § 811 [*] makes the effective maximum and minimum sentences the same, in violation of 13 V.”
State v. Martin, 2009 VT 15 (Vt. 2009). “We begin by briefly recounting the pertinent history of 28 V.S.A. § 811, which governed good-time credits until its repeal in 2005, and which applies to this case.”
Ladd v. Gorczyk, 2004 VT 87 (Vt. 2004). “Ladd contends the Department has erroneously applied the current statutory provision governing earned reduction of term, 28 V.S.A. § 811(a) & (b), which became effective July 1, 2000 and provides for a reduction of time for good behavior only from the maximum term of…”
State v. Kimmick, 2007 VT 45 (Vt. 2007). “Defendant’s third argument is that the district court’s sentence is illegal because reducing the maximum sentence through good-time credits under 28 V.S.A. § 811 * makes the effective maxi *637 mum and minimum sentences the same, in violation of 13 V.”
Conway v. Gorczyk, 765 A.2d 463 (Vt. 2000). “See 28 V.S.A. § 811(b). 1 Petitioner Charles Conway was terminated from participation in the DOC’s Cognitive Self Change program.”
LaFaso v. Patrissi, 633 A.2d 695 (Vt. 1993). “28 V.S.A. § 811(b). Any order of retroactive class relief for this violation must surmount DOC’s lack of record keeping and show what meritorious good time the inmate would otherwise have received.”
State v. Martin, 2009 VT 15 (Vt. 2009). “We begin by briefly recounting the pertinent history of 28 V.S.A. § 811, which governed good-time credits until its repeal in 2005, and which applies to this case.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 811(g) — 2 cases
State v. Martin, 2009 VT 15 (Vt. 2009). “We begin by briefly recounting the pertinent history of 28 V.S.A. § 811, which governed good-time credits until its repeal in 2005, and which applies to this case.”
State v. Stanley, 933 A.2d 184 (Vt. 2007). “), § 1 (former 28 V.S.A. § 811(g) (repealed by 2005, No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.