In Re Saucier, 167 A.2d 368 (Vt. 1961). · cites it 2דThe statute, 28 V.S.A. §904, gave the petitioner no right to notice and hearing as a condition precedent to his arrest and recommitment.”
In Re Lorette, 228 A.2d 790 (Vt. 1967). · cites it 2דThe argument of the petitioner is that the above cases, including the McKenna case, were decided by this Court prior to the passage of *288 28 V.S.A. §904, originally enacted as No.”
In Re St. Amour, 255 A.2d 667 (Vt. 1969). · cites it 2ד§904, applicable here reads in part, “If, in the judgment of the governor, such conditions (of the pardon) have been violated, he may cause such person to be apprehended and returned to his former condition of custody that execution of sentence may be complied with.” The pardon…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.