Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 904 (2026)
[Reserved for future use.]
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Subchapter 005 : SPECIAL TREATMENT PROGRAMS
(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 904)-
§ 904. [Reserved for future use.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1961–1969 · leading case: In re Saucier, 167 A.2d 368 (Vt. 1961).
In re Saucier, 167 A.2d 368 (Vt. 1961). “The statute, 28 V.S.A. §904, gave the petitioner no right to notice and hearing as a condition precedent to his arrest and recommitment.”
In re Lorette, 228 A.2d 790 (Vt. 1967). “The argument of the petitioner is that the above cases, including the McKenna case, were decided by this Court prior to the passage of *288 28 V.S.A. §904, originally enacted as No.”
In re St. Amour, 255 A.2d 667 (Vt. 1969). “§904, applicable here reads in part, “If, in the judgment of the governor, such conditions (of the pardon) have been violated, he may cause such person to be apprehended and returned to his former condition of custody that execution of sentence may be complied with.” The pardon…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.