Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 30 Chapter 5
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL POWERS

(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 203)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases, 1962–2019 · leading case: In Re Verizon New England, Inc., 795 A.2d 1196 (Vt. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Verizon New England, Inc., 795 A.2d 1196 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “Title 30 V.S.A. § 203(5) gives the PSB jurisdiction over a “company offering telecommunications service to the public on a common carrier basis.”
In Re Investigation Into Reg. of Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Servs., 2013 VT 23 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2× “The statute provides that transmission of electromagnetic communications “includes the use of any media such as wires, cables, television cables, microwaves, radio waves, light waves or any combination of those or similar media.”
Verizon New England Inc. v. Rhode Island Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 822 A.2d 187 (R.I. 2003). · cites it 2× “This definition is almost identical to the one in Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 30, § 203(5) (2000). See infra, note 7.”
Petition of Quechee Serv. Co., Inc., 690 A.2d 354 (Vt. 1996). · cites it 3× “In this case we review two orders of the Public Service Board concerning Quechee Service Company (QSC), a once-private sewer company that became subject to the jurisdiction of the Board following the adoption of 30 V.S.A. § 203(6) in 1993. In the first of the challenged orders…”
City of So. Burlington v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 344 A.2d 19 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 2× “30 V.S.A. § 203 gives it general supervision of electric companies, including those engaged in transmission.”
In Re Proposed Sale of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 2003 VT 53 (Vt. 2003). “Under 30 V.S.A. § 203(1), the PSB has jurisdiction over any company that manufactures, transmits, distributes or sells electricity “to be used ultimately by the public.”
In re Investigation Into Solarcity Corp., 210 A.3d 1255 (Vt. 2019). “, 30 V.S.A. § 203 ("The Public Utility Commission and the Department of Public Service shall have jurisdiction over the following described companies within the State, .”
In re Pfenning, 385 A.2d 1070 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 3× “§ 201 and 30 V.S.A. § 203, is the sole question presented for review by the question certified from the Public Service Board.”
In re Constr. & Operation of a Meteorological Tower, 210 A.3d 1230 (Vt. 2019). “Belisle argues that he is not subject to the PUC's supervision under 30 V.S.A. §§ 203 or 209 and therefore cannot be penalized for violating § 246.”
Kelly v. Alpstetten Ass'n, Inc., 303 A.2d 136 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 3× “A determination of the identity, or lack of it, between all the water users or property owners and the stockholders of the defendant corporation might well have made the resolution of this controversy simple and direct. If, as argued by the plaintiff, the defendant sold water to…”
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 838 F. Supp. 2d 183 (D. Vt. 2012). “" Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203 (1). . Central Vermont Public Service (CVPS) and Green Mountain Power (GMP).”
In Re Doolittle Mountain Lots, Inc., 2007 VT 104 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 2× “See 30 V.S.A. §§ 203, 209, 219. Here, the Board was asked to resolve a collateral dispute between a customer and its neighbors, because the resolution might allow petitioner to seek a specific kind of service from a regulated company.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203(1) — 3 cases
In Re Proposed Sale of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station, 2003 VT 53 (Vt. 2003). “Under 30 V.S.A. § 203(1), the PSB has jurisdiction over any company that manufactures, transmits, distributes or sells electricity “to be used ultimately by the public.”
City of So. Burlington v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 344 A.2d 19 (Vt. 1975). “30 V.S.A. § 203 gives it general supervision of electric companies, including those engaged in transmission.”
In re Bloch, 340 A.2d 51 (Vt. 1975).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203(2) — 3 cases
Wendland v. Green Mountain Power Corp., 318 A.2d 668 (Vt. 1974).
In Re Doolittle Mountain Lots, Inc., 2007 VT 104 (Vt. 2007). “See 30 V.S.A. §§ 203, 209, 219. Here, the Board was asked to resolve a collateral dispute between a customer and its neighbors, because the resolution might allow petitioner to seek a specific kind of service from a regulated company.”
In re Doolittle Mountain Lots, Inc., 938 A.2d 1230 (Vt. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203(3) — 2 cases
Kelly v. Alpstetten Ass'n, Inc., 303 A.2d 136 (Vt. 1973). “A determination of the identity, or lack of it, between all the water users or property owners and the stockholders of the defendant corporation might well have made the resolution of this controversy simple and direct. If, as argued by the plaintiff, the defendant sold water to…”
In re Pfenning, 385 A.2d 1070 (Vt. 1978). “§ 201 and 30 V.S.A. § 203, is the sole question presented for review by the question certified from the Public Service Board.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203(5) — 3 cases
In Re Verizon New England, Inc., 795 A.2d 1196 (Vt. 2002). “Title 30 V.S.A. § 203(5) gives the PSB jurisdiction over a “company offering telecommunications service to the public on a common carrier basis.”
In Re Investigation Into Reg. of Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Servs., 2013 VT 23 (Vt. 2013). “The statute provides that transmission of electromagnetic communications “includes the use of any media such as wires, cables, television cables, microwaves, radio waves, light waves or any combination of those or similar media.”
Verizon New England Inc. v. Rhode Island Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 822 A.2d 187 (R.I. 2003). “This definition is almost identical to the one in Vt. Stat. Ann. Tit. 30, § 203(5) (2000). See infra, note 7.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 203(6) — 1 case
Petition of Quechee Serv. Co., Inc., 690 A.2d 354 (Vt. 1996). “In this case we review two orders of the Public Service Board concerning Quechee Service Company (QSC), a once-private sewer company that became subject to the jurisdiction of the Board following the adoption of 30 V.S.A. § 203(6) in 1993. In the first of the challenged orders…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.