The Commission shall have the powers of a court of record in the determination and
adjudication of all matters over which it is given jurisdiction. It may render judgments,
make orders and decrees, and enforce the same by any suitable process issuable by
courts in this State. The Commission shall have an official seal on which shall be
the words, “State of Vermont. Public Utility Commission. Official Seal.” (Amended 1959, No. 329 (Adj. Sess.), § 39(b), eff. March 1, 1961.)
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 733 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2013). “See Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, §§ 9 , 203. .The criteria the Board must consider in deciding whether to issue a CPG relate to such issues as power generation stability, economic impact on the State, aesthetic and environmental issues, and likelihood of compliance with federal…”
In re Petition of Conservation Law Found., 188 A.3d 667 (Vt. 2018). “§ 9 (establishing that the Commission "shall have the powers of a court of record in the determination and adjudication of all matters over which it is given jurisdiction" and "may render judgments, make orders and decrees, and enforce the same by any suitable process issuable…”
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, 2007 VT 103 (Vt. 2007). “NEC argues on appeal that the Board violated the statute that created the Board, VAPA, 30 V.S.A. § 9, and 30 V.S.A. § 248 in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing before making the final determination that the NRC assessment met the requirements of the March 15, 2004 order.”
In re Petition of Apple Hill Solar LLC, 2021 VT 69 (Vt. 2021). “§ 9 (providing that PUC has “the powers of a court of record 22 in the determination and adjudication of all matters over which it is given jurisdiction” and “may render judgments, make orders and decrees, and enforce the same by any suitable process issuable by courts in this…”
Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc. v. Bandel, 375 A.2d 975 (Vt. 1977). “The Public Service Board operates as a hearing body under the general authority of 30 V.S.A. § 9, which gives it the powers of a court of record in the determination and adjudication of matters before it.”
In Re Vermont Elec. Power Producers, Inc., 683 A.2d 716 (Vt. 1996). “Accordingly, we must reach the merits of VPX’s claim of error in the PSB’s denial of its disqualification motion.”
In Re Burlington Elec. Dep't, 450 A.2d 1131 (Vt. 1982). “” Since many of the hearings were conducted by a single member, Winooski concludes that the absence of a quorum deprived the Board of jurisdiction to conduct the hearings and makes invalid any order based on hearings conducted outside the Board’s jurisdiction.”
In re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, 182 Vt. 340 (Vt. 2007). “NEC argues on appeal that the Board violated the statute that created the Board, VARA, 30 V.S.A. § 9, and 30 V.S.A. § 248 in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing before making the final determination that the NRC assessment met the requirements of the March 15, 2004 order.”
In re Investigation Into Gen. Order 45, 542 A.2d 288 (Vt. 1988). “2d 792, 794 (1982); see also 30 V.S.A. § 9 (“The board shall have the powers of a court of record ----”).”
PLH Vineyard Sky LLC v. Vermont Pub. Util. Comm'n (D. Vt. 2024). “30 V.S.A. § 9. Plaintiff’s claim of ill motive on the part of two Commissioners plays no role in determining their entitlement to judicial immunity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.