Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 1141 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : JUDGES AND COURT APPOINTEES

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 1141)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1994 · leading case: Jane L. Wheel v. Stuart Robinson, Superintendent of Chittenden Cnty. Corr. Ctr., 34 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jane L. Wheel v. Stuart Robinson, Superintendent of Chittenden Cnty. Corr. Ctr., 34 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 1994). “” See Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 32, § 1141(b). 2 During late 1985, the Attorney General of Vermont began an investigation into whether Wheel had improperly submitted false pay vouchers for days on which she did not work.”
State v. Wheel, 587 A.2d 933 (Vt. 1990). “3 32 V.S.A. § 1141(b) provides that “[a]ssistant judges of the superior court shall receive pay for such days as they attend court when it is in actual session, or during a court recess when engaged'in the special performance of official duties.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 1141(b) — 2 cases
Jane L. Wheel v. Stuart Robinson, Superintendent of Chittenden Cnty. Corr. Ctr., 34 F.3d 60 (2d Cir. 1994). “” See Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 32, § 1141(b). 2 During late 1985, the Attorney General of Vermont began an investigation into whether Wheel had improperly submitted false pay vouchers for days on which she did not work.”
State v. Wheel, 587 A.2d 933 (Vt. 1990). “3 32 V.S.A. § 1141(b) provides that “[a]ssistant judges of the superior court shall receive pay for such days as they attend court when it is in actual session, or during a court recess when engaged'in the special performance of official duties.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.