Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : AGRICULTURAL LAND AND MANAGED FORESTLAND USE VALUE APPRAISAL PROGRAM

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 3752)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 3× “” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(9)(A). “Minimum acceptable standards for forest management” are defined, in turn, as “refer[ring] to certain standards established by the Commissioner of Forest, Parks and Recreation.”
Jones v. Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “See 32 V.S.A. § 3752(12) (defining “use value appraisal” as price land would command if it remained in agricultural or forest use).”
Goodrum v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 9× “The Department of Taxes determined that the Farm Buildings did not qualify for the UVA Program because they are not leased to or operated by a farmer as defined by 32 V.S.A. § 3752. Appellants appealed to the Director of the Division of Property Valuation and Review (PVR) who…”
Vt Mut. v. Johnson (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). · cites it 4× “Dale Johnson et al VMIC argues that the definition of farmer at 32 V.S.A. § 3752(7) circumscribes the farming uses described in 23 V.”
Goodrum v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2014 VT 128 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 4× “The UVA Program accepts as eligible for enrollment all farm buildings and other farm improvements which are actively used by a farmer as part of a farming operation, are owned by a farmer or leased to a farmer .”
Jones v. Dept. of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “See 32 V.S.A. § 3752(12) (defining "use value appraisal" as price land would command if it remained in agricultural or forest use).”
Labrie v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 2× “Under 32 V.S.A. § 3752(14), farm buildings may be enrolled in the Current Use Program if the applicant meets certain requirements.”
Charles Jackson, III v. Town of West Haven (Vt. 2016). “” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(10). Plaintiff notes that his lease does not exceed 999 years, and therefore asserts that he should also not be considered an owner for tax purposes.”
Hinsdale Trust Boundary Adjustment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 32 V.S.A. § 3752(1) (defining agricultural land); id.”
In re Leonard & Sayour Permitted Use Zoning Permit (Vt. 2013). “” Neighbor points to definitions of “agricultural land,” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(1), and “farming,” 10 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(1) — 2 cases
Hinsdale Trust Boundary Adjustment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “See 32 V.S.A. § 3752(1) (defining agricultural land); id.”
In re Leonard & Sayour Permitted Use Zoning Permit (Vt. 2013). “” Neighbor points to definitions of “agricultural land,” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(1), and “farming,” 10 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(10) — 1 case
Charles Jackson, III v. Town of West Haven (Vt. 2016). “” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(10). Plaintiff notes that his lease does not exceed 999 years, and therefore asserts that he should also not be considered an owner for tax purposes.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(12) — 3 cases
Jones v. Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “See 32 V.S.A. § 3752(12) (defining “use value appraisal” as price land would command if it remained in agricultural or forest use).”
Jones v. Dept. of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “See 32 V.S.A. § 3752(12) (defining "use value appraisal" as price land would command if it remained in agricultural or forest use).”
Goodrum v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2014 VT 128 (Vt. 2014). “The UVA Program accepts as eligible for enrollment all farm buildings and other farm improvements which are actively used by a farmer as part of a farming operation, are owned by a farmer or leased to a farmer .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(14) — 3 cases
Goodrum v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2014 VT 128 (Vt. 2014). “The UVA Program accepts as eligible for enrollment all farm buildings and other farm improvements which are actively used by a farmer as part of a farming operation, are owned by a farmer or leased to a farmer .”
Labrie v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “Under 32 V.S.A. § 3752(14), farm buildings may be enrolled in the Current Use Program if the applicant meets certain requirements.”
Goodrum v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “The Department of Taxes determined that the Farm Buildings did not qualify for the UVA Program because they are not leased to or operated by a farmer as defined by 32 V.S.A. § 3752. Appellants appealed to the Director of the Division of Property Valuation and Review (PVR) who…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(5) — 1 case
Labrie v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “Under 32 V.S.A. § 3752(14), farm buildings may be enrolled in the Current Use Program if the applicant meets certain requirements.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(7) — 3 cases
Vt Mut. v. Johnson (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “Dale Johnson et al VMIC argues that the definition of farmer at 32 V.S.A. § 3752(7) circumscribes the farming uses described in 23 V.”
Goodrum v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “The Department of Taxes determined that the Farm Buildings did not qualify for the UVA Program because they are not leased to or operated by a farmer as defined by 32 V.S.A. § 3752. Appellants appealed to the Director of the Division of Property Valuation and Review (PVR) who…”
Goodrum v. Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2014 VT 128 (Vt. 2014). “The UVA Program accepts as eligible for enrollment all farm buildings and other farm improvements which are actively used by a farmer as part of a farming operation, are owned by a farmer or leased to a farmer .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(7)(A) — 1 case
Goodrum v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “The Department of Taxes determined that the Farm Buildings did not qualify for the UVA Program because they are not leased to or operated by a farmer as defined by 32 V.S.A. § 3752. Appellants appealed to the Director of the Division of Property Valuation and Review (PVR) who…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(9)(A) — 1 case
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). “” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(9)(A). “Minimum acceptable standards for forest management” are defined, in turn, as “refer[ring] to certain standards established by the Commissioner of Forest, Parks and Recreation.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3752(9)(B)(iii) — 1 case
Plum Creek Maine Timberlands, LLC v. Vermont Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec. & Vermont Dep't of Taxes, 2016 VT 103 (Vt. 2016). “” 32 V.S.A. § 3752(9)(A). “Minimum acceptable standards for forest management” are defined, in turn, as “refer[ring] to certain standards established by the Commissioner of Forest, Parks and Recreation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.