Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : INDIVIDUAL LISTS

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 4111)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1972–2015 · leading case: Murdoch v. Town of Shelburne, 939 A.2d 458 (Vt. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Murdoch v. Town of Shelburne, 939 A.2d 458 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 8× “Subchapter 3, which includes the section under scrutiny in this ease — 32 V.S.A. § 4111© — deals with the development and publication of the individual lists or abstracts.”
Bargman v. Brewer, 454 A.2d 1253 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 3× “See 32 V.S.A. § 4111(d). Plaintiffs also alleged that defendants had failed to include within the grand list “a brief description and listed valuation of each separate parcel of taxable real estate and separate columns which would show the approximate acreages of woodland,…”
Spears v. Town of Enosburg, 571 A.2d 604 (Vt. 1989). “Plaintiffs argued that once the sanction is imposed, the appraisal listed in the grand list for the “sanction year” continues to be the appraisal for the succeeding years, *261 unless the listers follow proper reappraisal procedures and give the taxpayer notice of the change…”
Villeneuve v. Town of Underhill, 296 A.2d 192 (Vt. 1972). “The facts demonstrate it to be readily apparent the plaintiffs sought to use the voluntary filing of an inventory as a means of expressing their objections to the appraised values of their properties as they were listed in the previous year.”
Sinha v. Town of Shelburne (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). · cites it 2× “32 V.S.A. § 4111(e) (emphasis added). It is undisputed that Town mailed notices of the 2003 reappraisal of the parcels to Taxpayer by first class bulk mail.”
Charles Chandler v. Town of Newfane & Doris Knechtel, Individually & as Emp. of Town of Newfane (Vt. 2015). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4111(g). If still aggrieved, plaintiff could seek relief from the board of civil authority.”
Chandler v. Town of Newfane (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “32 V.S.A. § 4111(g). If still aggrieved, he could seek relief from the board of civil authority.”
Burton v. Town of Salisbury, 790 A.2d 394 (Vt. 2001). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4111(e). Having failed to appeal, however, they then failed to file an objection when they received their tax bill, as required by 32 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111(a) — 1 case
Murdoch v. Town of Shelburne, 939 A.2d 458 (Vt. 2007). “Subchapter 3, which includes the section under scrutiny in this ease — 32 V.S.A. § 4111© — deals with the development and publication of the individual lists or abstracts.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111(c) — 1 case
Murdoch v. Town of Shelburne, 939 A.2d 458 (Vt. 2007). “Subchapter 3, which includes the section under scrutiny in this ease — 32 V.S.A. § 4111© — deals with the development and publication of the individual lists or abstracts.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111(d) — 1 case
Bargman v. Brewer, 454 A.2d 1253 (Vt. 1983). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4111(d). Plaintiffs also alleged that defendants had failed to include within the grand list “a brief description and listed valuation of each separate parcel of taxable real estate and separate columns which would show the approximate acreages of woodland,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111(e) — 5 cases
Murdoch v. Town of Shelburne, 939 A.2d 458 (Vt. 2007). “Subchapter 3, which includes the section under scrutiny in this ease — 32 V.S.A. § 4111© — deals with the development and publication of the individual lists or abstracts.”
Spears v. Town of Enosburg, 571 A.2d 604 (Vt. 1989). “Plaintiffs argued that once the sanction is imposed, the appraisal listed in the grand list for the “sanction year” continues to be the appraisal for the succeeding years, *261 unless the listers follow proper reappraisal procedures and give the taxpayer notice of the change…”
Villeneuve v. Town of Underhill, 296 A.2d 192 (Vt. 1972). “The facts demonstrate it to be readily apparent the plaintiffs sought to use the voluntary filing of an inventory as a means of expressing their objections to the appraised values of their properties as they were listed in the previous year.”
Sinha v. Town of Shelburne (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). “32 V.S.A. § 4111(e) (emphasis added). It is undisputed that Town mailed notices of the 2003 reappraisal of the parcels to Taxpayer by first class bulk mail.”
Burton v. Town of Salisbury, 790 A.2d 394 (Vt. 2001). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4111(e). Having failed to appeal, however, they then failed to file an objection when they received their tax bill, as required by 32 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111(f) — 1 case
Murdoch v. Town of Shelburne, 939 A.2d 458 (Vt. 2007). “Subchapter 3, which includes the section under scrutiny in this ease — 32 V.S.A. § 4111© — deals with the development and publication of the individual lists or abstracts.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 4111(g) — 2 cases
Charles Chandler v. Town of Newfane & Doris Knechtel, Individually & as Emp. of Town of Newfane (Vt. 2015). “See 32 V.S.A. § 4111(g). If still aggrieved, plaintiff could seek relief from the board of civil authority.”
Chandler v. Town of Newfane (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “32 V.S.A. § 4111(g). If still aggrieved, he could seek relief from the board of civil authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.