Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 32 Chapter 133
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 5261 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 009 : DELINQUENT TAXES

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 5261)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1979–2025 · leading case: Matthew Burgess v. Lamoille Hous. P'ship, Town of Morristown, Mary Ann Wilson as Collector of Taxes & Sharon Green, Esq., 2016 VT 31 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matthew Burgess v. Lamoille Hous. P'ship, Town of Morristown, Mary Ann Wilson as Collector of Taxes & Sharon Green, Esq., 2016 VT 31 (Vt. 2016). “” 32 V.S.A. § 5261. On the other hand, if the property is timely redeemed, it is restored to the original owner free and clear of any claims of the person who “purchased” it at the tax sale.”
Johnathan J. Billewicz v. Town of Fair Haven, 2021 VT 20 (Vt. 2021). “Town of Barnet, where we explained that a taxpayer whose property has been purchased by the Because a claim subject to § 5263 is one “maintained against the grantee of .”
Westine v. Whitcomb, Clark & Moeser, 547 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1988). · cites it 3× “That duty is set forth in 32 V.S.A. § 5261, which provides: When the time for redemption has passed and the land is not redeemed, the collector or his successor shall execute to the purchaser a deed, which shall convey to him a title against the person for whose tax it was sold…”
Morse v. King, 398 A.2d 299 (Vt. 1979). “32 V.S.A. § 5261 provides in material part that when land sold at a tax sale is not redeemed the collector shall execute to the purchaser a deed which shall convey to him a title against the person for whose tax it was sold and those claiming under him.”
Rote v. Town of Concord (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “Following the tax sale, the statutes require a one-year redemption period to allow the delinquent taxpayer to redeem the property by paying their back taxes. 32 V.S.A. § 5260 (allowing for redemption “within one year from the day of sale”).”
Susco (Bankr. D. Vt. 2025). “The taxpayer then commenced suit against the town and the purchaser seeking to recover the property or to recover damages under an unjust enrichment theory.”
Moore v. Town of Brighton (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “See 32 V.S.A. § 5261; see also Westine, 150 Vt.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.